Did Subscription Internet Video Competition Just Get a Death Blow?

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

AmazonFireTV
Amazon.com Inc.
There’s been a lot of talk in recent weeks related to offering pay-TV packages that give customers more of what they want for less money. One of the main forces behind this chatter has been Sony Corp. (NYSE: SNE) which signed a deal last month with Viacom Inc. (NASDAQ: VIAB) that gave Sony the right to carry 22 Viacom networks on its proposed Internet on-demand video subscription (over-the-top, or OTT) programming package.

The expectation (hope?) that Sony would put together a package that cost less than a pay-TV subscription has apparently evaporated. The New York Post is reporting that Sony is preparing to release its subscription video on-demand Internet service by the end of the year at a price of up to $80 a month. Another source told the Post that the price would be competitive with a basic cable package that costs $60 to $65 a month. A source told the Post:

[Sony] had huge ambitions of breaking up the bundle and being the champion of the consumer, but they’ve had no success in doing that and they’re licking their wounds. They got creamed in negotiations.

Dish Network Corp. (NASDAQ: DISH) is also working on a package that many observers expect to be priced at around $30 a month, about the level that was expected from Sony. Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) bought the OTT service OnCue from Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC) earlier this year and said it plans to offer OTT programming as early as the middle of next year. AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T) has said that it would bundle the DirecTV (NASDAQ: DTV) satellite pay-TV service with a fixed broadband wireless service for rural customers if the proposed merger between the companies is approved.

If the Post is right about Sony’s pricing scheme, none of these plans will make much difference in the current pay-TV landscape, which, of course, is just what the cable companies want: limited competition and high rents.

ALSO READ: Comcast, Time Warner Rank Lowest in Customer Satisfaction

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618