Boeing, Lockheed May Duel Alone for Air Force Training Jet

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Boeing, Lockheed May Duel Alone for Air Force Training Jet

© courtesy of Lockheed Martin Corp.

[cnxvideo id=”625476″ placement=”ros”]The competitive bidding for a $16 billion contract to supply the U.S. Air Force with a new training jet may be winnowed from its current number of potential bidders. Aviation Week has reported that Northrop Grumman Corp. (NYSE: NOC) may pull out, and neither Sierra Nevada nor Textron Inc. (NYSE: TXT) is willing to say definitively that they will submit a bid.

That leaves Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) and Lockheed Martin Corp. (NYSE: LMT), the nation’s two largest defense contractors, to slug it out for the contract. A team led by Raytheon Corp. (NYSE: RTN) and Italy’s Leonardo pulled out last week, and Textron has never said more than that it is considering a bid. Sierra Nevada, a privately held aerospace firm, has been similarly reluctant publicly to commit to a bid.

The issue that is giving the potential competitors second thoughts is price. The winning bidder almost certainly will have to submit the lowest price. Both Boeing and Lockheed can afford to battle it out on price, but Raytheon decided it could not, and now it appears that Northrop Grumman is thinking the same thing.

[nativounit]

Northrop Grumman CEO Wes Bush said last week that the company has not made a go/no-go decision yet, even though it has made a substantial investment in a flying prototype. Aviation week cited Bush: “We don’t want to walk ourselves into a decision to do something just because we’ve been doing it.”

If the contract award comes down to just Boeing and Lockheed, both will come in with the lowest price they can reasonably make, regardless of whether they can make a profit. Why? To keep their plants open and to maintain some positive cash flow to impress investors. Cost overruns and losses can be dealt with later.

It is even possible, though not likely, that whichever company wins can actually build the planes for the low-ball price.

Lockheed snagged more than $36 billion in federal contracts in fiscal year 2015, more than twice as much as second-ranked contractor Boeing, which managed to haul in more than $16 billion. But Boeing’s commercial jet business added to its defense business nearly doubled Lockheed’s 2016 total revenues. And Lockheed’s 2016 revenues were about double Raytheon’s and Northrop Grumman’s.

And with the current administration’s emphasis on lowering costs — or at least announcing that it has lowered costs — only the super-rich can afford to play. That means Boeing and Lockheed.

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618