I’m thinking of delaying retirement in order to spend more time with my family now instead of grinding at work – is this too risky?

Photo of Joey Frenette
By Joey Frenette Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
I’m thinking of delaying retirement in order to spend more time with my family now instead of grinding at work – is this too risky?

© Sabrina Bracher / Shutterstock.com

If you’re in the middle of your career, have moved up many rungs on the so-called corporate ladder, and are just starting to feel the effect of the heavier workload and added stress, you may be thinking about bringing things down a notch. Indeed, signs of burnout may begin to arise after one has pushed themselves to the limit for a rather extended period of time.

Though overexertion may be fine in short bursts (think 60-80 hour weeks during a “crunch time” at your work whereby deadlines must be met), logging in far more than 40 hours a week consistently may just be too much, regardless of the financial rewards to be had.

Sure, extra money, being next in line for a promotion, and stock options are all fantastic things, but if you’re feeling any subtle signs of burnout, perhaps the overwork and workaholism attitude may not be worth it in the grander scheme of things, given it may not be sustainable for lengthy periods.

In this piece, we’ll have a look at a physician on the r/chubbyFire subreddit who faces a pretty common dilemma.

On the one hand, they want to make progress on their retirement goals. But on the other hand, the doctor seems a tad burnt out (being a doctor entails some very long hours) and appears more than open to “scaling back” at the cost of a smaller retirement nest egg so that they can spend more time with their young child who’s just one-year-old.

Key Points About This Article

  • A busy physician took to Reddit in search of advice as to whether he should step back to spend more time with family.
  • If one’s feeling burnt out, stepping back is a great idea, provided one fully understands and accepts the financial consequences.

Coins stack with balance scale. Money management, financial plan, time value of money, business idea and Creative ideas for saving money concept.
sommart sombutwanitkul / Shutterstock.com

Time with family or money? The age-old dilemma many professionals face in their careers.

Indeed, whenever there’s a baby (or toddler) involved, forgoing some cash to spend more quality time can be a fantastic trade-off. That is, assuming that the person won’t experience difficulties re-entering the workforce when it’s time to go back. In any case, your mileage may vary, and money may be more important than time spent with one’s children in their early years.

As they say, children are only young once. And they grow up pretty quickly! As such, I think the doctor is right to think about stepping back, at least for a while, even if it means missing out on a few “prime earnings” years. Of course, there are serious financial risks as a professional in taking such a step back to spend more time with family.

Most notably, the lost income would cause retirement goals to be pushed out further. Further, one may struggle to make the jump back into the workforce at a wage that’s acceptable for them. The doctor did mention that a top worry is their future income “is not guaranteed.”

The bottom line

In short, there are financial risks of stepping back from one’s career too soon. At the same time, however, there are also less quantifiable risks of not doing so. Most notably, missing out on experiences with family and young children is something that one can never get back, no matter how much cash they have. Of course, the trade-off (money for time) will be worthwhile for some but not for others.

That’s why I’d suggest the physician discuss the matter with the rest of the family so that they can discover what they value more. After thinking things through, I’d then book a chat with a wealth planner to gain greater clarity on the full extent of the financial impact of stepping back.

Photo of Joey Frenette
About the Author Joey Frenette →

Joey is a 24/7 Wall St. contributor and seasoned investment writer whose work can also be found in publications such as The Motley Fool and TipRanks. Holding a B.A.Sc in Computer Engineering from the University of British Columbia (UBC), Joey has leveraged his technical background to provide insightful stock analyses to readers.

Joey's investment philosophy is heavily influenced by Warren Buffett's value investing principles. As a dedicated Buffett disciple, Joey is committed to unearthing value in the tech sector and beyond.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618