Should I go all in on JEPQ and live off the dividends – what are the risks?

Photo of Joey Frenette
By Joey Frenette Published

Key Points

  • The JEPQ is a massive 11.3%-yielder that’s tempting to double down on right now.

  • Going all-in on a single investment could leave a portfolio undiversified.

  • The JEPQ is great, but do consider other dividend payers as well.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Should I go all in on JEPQ and live off the dividends – what are the risks?

© 24/7 Wall St.

Covered call ETFs seem to be one of the best things since sliced bread for passive income investors who want to raise the bar on their yield without all the downside risk that comes with going for the dividend (or yield) traps. Indeed, specialty income ETFs check all the boxes for a certain class of dividend investor. But, as is the case with most ETFs and individual stocks, there are risks that should not be taken lightly.

At the end of the day, there’s no such thing as “risk-free” when it comes to equities. And while covered calls may make for a less volatile ride, they can still lose investors’ money, and given the inherent yield volatility, investors had better prepare for fluctuations, not only in the share price but also in the amount of monthly income they’ll receive as well. Sure, covered call ETFs are a fantastic way to give your income stream a huge shot in the arm. But provided all the risks are understood and managed!

This investor loves the JEPQ. They’re thinking about going all-in

In this piece, we’ll check in on the case of an individual self-guided investor who’s such a big fan of the JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (NASDAQ:JEPQ), which is a covered call ETF that invests in the Nasdaq 100 index, that he’s thinking about going “all in” on the ETF with the intent of living off the distributions paid out monthly. On the surface, that seems like a good idea.

The JEPQ yields a massive 11.28% at the time of this writing, which is almost triple that of the so-called “4% rule.” And while the JEPQ is a terrific income stream enhancer, I would warn against going “all-in” on any single type of investment. Diversification matters, especially at a time like this, when a few words from the President could send a group of stocks into a bit of a tailspin.

While the JEPQ is diversified across 100 names (within the Nasdaq 100), it’s noteworthy that most of the stocks are within the tech sector. Additionally, the yield, while on the high end of the range, won’t stay in one spot for the long haul. The premium income generated from the sale of call options can vary, sometimes significantly, based on implied volatility.

If we sail into a summer season of minimal volatility (traders and retail investors head off on their summer vacations), there’s a good chance the yield on the JEPQ and similar covered call ETFs could move lower.

Either way, I’m of the opinion that it’s not a great idea to fund your retirement with the assumption that a nearly 12% yield will hold up and you’ll be paid the same amount every single month. In essence, covered call ETF distributions can fluctuate wildly based on a number of factors.

Staying diversified is key

If a JEPQ distribution comes up short in any given month, there should be no reason for alarm if one’s sufficiently diversified. Many investors lean heavily on the JEPQ and have done quite well in recent years (the income boost comes at the cost of upside potential), but for those who rely on dividends and distributions to make rent in any given month, I’d say it’s not a bad idea to diversify into dividend-paying stocks or ETFs that won’t experience flucutating yields.

Energy Transfer (NYSE:ET | ET Price Prediction) and Enbridge (NYSE:ENB) are midstream energy plays that yield 7.43% and 6.11%, respectively, at the time of this writing. Such names could offer greater distribution certainty when paired alongside a covered call ETF such as the JEPQ. 

In any case, for a young investor who’s willing to put up with yield volatility, I’m not against a heavy position in a covered call ETF. However, I don’t think going “all-in” is the right way to go, especially for those who don’t quite understand the inner workings of premium income ETFs.

Photo of Joey Frenette
About the Author Joey Frenette →

Joey is a 24/7 Wall St. contributor and seasoned investment writer whose work can also be found in publications such as The Motley Fool and TipRanks. Holding a B.A.Sc in Computer Engineering from the University of British Columbia (UBC), Joey has leveraged his technical background to provide insightful stock analyses to readers.

Joey's investment philosophy is heavily influenced by Warren Buffett's value investing principles. As a dedicated Buffett disciple, Joey is committed to unearthing value in the tech sector and beyond.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618