Why Starbucks May Have to Lower Its Coffee Prices at the Register

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

coffee
Thinkstock
A massive fire at a Brazilian port virtually destroyed six warehouses containing 180,000 tons of raw sugar waiting to be exported. That will cut into an expected sugar surplus of 2 million tons in the current marketing year. Four people were injured in the fire but there were no deaths reported.

While the loss of the sugar will certainly affect warehouse owner Copersucar, the world’s second-largest sugar trader after Cargill Inc., the price of sugar should see little change.

At the same time, coffee prices are falling as weather conditions in Brazil have improved after four years of drought in the world’s largest coffee exporting country.

The net result for Starbucks Corp. (NASDAQ: SBUX) and other coffee purveyors should be lower costs. And the companies could (should?) pass its lower costs on to its customers.

Coffee prices are down 21% so far this year and sugar prices have risen somewhat to 19.5 cents a pound in New York, but over the past two years sugar prices are down 47% according to Bloomberg.

What about milk for that vente latte? For some time Starbucks has blamed rising milk prices for the higher prices it charges customers. But milk production is higher than it was a year ago and is on a five month string of higher production levels which should have the effect of reducing prices.

We noted earlier Monday morning that China’s state TV network is charging Starbucks with unfair pricing in the Middle Kingdom. The company denied that it is overcharging in China.

Starbucks’ operating income was sharply higher in the second quarter and are estimated to rise by $0.09 sequentially when the company reports results on October 31st. Perhaps it’s time to give customers a break.

Shares of Starbucks are up about 0.3% in mid-afternoon trading on Monday at $79.58 after posting a new 52-week high of $79.91 earlier. The 52-week low is $44.27.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618