Women Slam Walmart on Pregnancy Policies

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

WalMart logo
courtesy of Wal-Mart Stores
Citing what they call “the illegal and unethical treatment of pregnant workers,” a group of mothers who work for Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE: WMT) met in Chicago on Wednesday to develop a list of policy changes that are aimed at both accommodating pregnant women’s health and ending “widespread financial hardship forced onto working women at Walmart.”

The list includes a minimum hourly wage of $15; consistent, full-time work; compliance with the Pregnancy Discrimination Act and the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act; installation of breastfeeding stations or family rooms in stores; and acceptance of pregnancy-related doctors’ notes.

In a press release, the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) and a union-backed group called OUR Walmart said the company did make changes to its pregnancy policies in March of this year. Walmart denies any connection between the policy change and a letter the company received in January 2013 from a group called A Better Balance (ABB) and another letter from the same group in January 2014.

A class action lawsuit was filed against Walmart earlier this year for “dangerous discrimination against pregnant workers,” and on Monday, another pregnant woman filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission related to her firing by Walmart “while she was at doctors’ visits related to her pregnancy.”

A report in the Washington Post from April notes that courts have generally sided with employers, including Walmart, that interpret narrowly the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. One employment discrimination expert at the University of Dayton told the Post, “[Walmart’s] policy is written in such a way that complies with federal law. It’s just that the federal law sucks.”

Regarding the policy changes related to wages, the press release points to a study by public policy research group Demos that found that $25,000 annual salary for full-time employees of retail companies that employ more than 1,000 workers could lift 900,000 women and their families out of poverty or near poverty.

ALSO READ: German Workers Walk Out at Amazon Warehouses

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618