This Is the Ugliest Cat Breed in the World

Photo of Douglas A. McIntyre
By Douglas A. McIntyre Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
This Is the Ugliest Cat Breed in the World

© eugenesergeev / iStock via Getty Images

Presumably, people who own cats pick ones that they believe have above average looks, at least compared to other cats. It begs the question of why people own ugly cats. Maybe “ugly” is in the eye of the beholder. Recently, a study ranked cats by looks. Several were graded as ugly — and the ugliest cat breed in the world is the Himalayan. 

There are 600 million cats in the world. Just over 200 million have owners. The rest are strays. According to the American Veterinary Medical Association, nearly 32 million households in America have a cat. Cats probably started living with people around 3,700 years ago. (Americans love their pets. See the official pets and animals of every state.)

Cat owners can be particular about which breeds they own. Shorthair domestic cats are the most popular in America. Far fewer people in the U.S. own more exotic breeds, which include Persian and Bombay cats. The most beautiful cat breeds in the world, according to research, are the Norwegian forest, Russian blue, and Manx. 

24/7 Tempo reviewed All About Cats’ research piece titled “Beautiful Cats: The Golden Ratio Reveals The Most Beautiful Cat Breeds.” The methodology used to identify the world’s ugliest cats and the most beautiful cats  is idiosyncratic, so many cat owners will not agree with it. 

The way that the study calculates cat beauty is by measuring the distance between different places on this cat’s face, including the eyes, nose, and mouth. Apparently, the same methodology is used to measure movie stars and celebrities. The ideal ratio is 1.62. According to Britannica, this measure originated with the ancient mathematician Euclid and involves a complex formula.

Two cat breeds scored 1.65, and one scored 1.59 — just 0.03 difference from the ideal ratio of 1.62. These are the Norwegian forest and Russian blue, and the Manx. 

At the other end of the scale three cats were assigned high numbers — far greater than the ideal ratio. The ugliest cats are the Himalayan, with a difference of 56.87 from the ideal ratio of 1.62, the Peterbald with a difference of 18.16, and the Persian with a difference of 5.87. The Himalayan and Persian are related.

According to Pet Finder, “The Himalayan is a hybrid breed identical to the Persian, but distinguished by the points on the cats’ extremities (the facial mask, feet, ears, and tail) which results in a Persian-type cat with the coloring and deep blue eyes of the Siamese-patterned cat.” (These are the most common health problems in cats (and how they are treated).)

And Himalayan are expensive. A kitten can cost as much as $3,500. A word to the wise for cat owners — ugly can be expensive.

Click here to see the ugliest cat breeds in the world

Svetlana Popova / iStock via Getty Images

1. Manx
> Ratio: 1.59
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.03

[in-text-ad]

Liudmila Anufrieva / iStock via Getty Images

1. Russian Blue
> Ratio: 1.65
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.03

[recirclink id=977462]

undefined undefined / Getty Images

1. Norwegian Forest
> Ratio: 1.65
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.03

NikShargin / Getty Images

4. Siberian
> Ratio: 1.67
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.05

[in-text-ad-2]

sergeyskleznev / Getty Images

4. Ragamuffin
> Ratio: 1.67
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.05

eugenesergeev / iStock via Getty Images

6. American Curl
> Ratio: 1.56
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.06

[in-text-ad]

7. Siamese
> Ratio: 1.55
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.07

[recirclink id=912510]

Thomas Leirikh / Getty Images

7. Selkirk Rex
> Ratio: 1.69
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.07

nikkytok / iStock via Getty Images

9. Maine Coon
> Ratio: 1.71
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.09

[in-text-ad-2]

Anna Volgina / iStock via Getty Images

10. Turkish Angora
> Ratio: 1.72
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.10

Thomas Leirikh / iStock via Getty Images

10. Egyptian Mau
> Ratio: 1.72
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.10

[in-text-ad]

Jane-Khomi / iStock via Getty Images

12. American Bobtail
> Ratio: 1.73
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.11

[recirclink id=879078]

Nynke van Holten / iStock via Getty Images

13. Pixiebob
> Ratio: 1.74
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.12

Vadimborkin / iStock via Getty Images

13. Birman
> Ratio: 1.74
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.12

[in-text-ad-2]

Boyloso / iStock via Getty Images

13. American Wirehair
> Ratio: 1.74
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.12

kla3950 / iStock via Getty Images

16. American Shorthair
> Ratio: 1.49
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.13

[in-text-ad]

MirasWonderland / Getty Images

17. Ragdoll
> Ratio: 1.76
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.14

[recirclink id=934069]

photo by Volchanskiy / iStock via Getty Images

17. Ocicat
> Ratio: 1.76
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.14

ginosphotos / iStock via Getty Images

17. Korat
> Ratio: 1.76
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.14

[in-text-ad-2]

cunfek / iStock via Getty Images

20. Chartreux
> Ratio: 1.77
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.15

lafar / iStock via Getty Images

21. Scottish Fold
> Ratio: 1.78
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.16

[in-text-ad]

oxico / iStock via Getty Images

22. LaPerm
> Ratio: 1.79
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.17

[recirclink id=928143]

fotojagodka / iStock via Getty Images

23. European Burmese
> Ratio: 1.85
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.23

Seregraff / iStock via Getty Images

24. Munchkin
> Ratio: 1.86
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.24

[in-text-ad-2]

CarolinaSmith / iStock via Getty Images

25. Tonkinese
> Ratio: 1.88
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.26

fuiyau yap / iStock via Getty Images

25. Japanese Bobtail
> Ratio: 1.88
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.26

[in-text-ad]

Фотограф:Анна Утехина, CC BY-SA 3.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

25. Balinese-Javanese
> Ratio: 1.88
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.26

[recirclink id=977462]

Ed-Ni-Photo / Getty Images

28. Bombay
> Ratio: 1.92
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.30

Nataliia Pyzhova / iStock via Getty Images

29. Toyger
> Ratio: 1.93
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.31

[in-text-ad-2]

Jupiterimages / Getty Images

30. Turkish Van
> Ratio: 2.01
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.39

31. Bengal
> Ratio: 2.03
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.41

[in-text-ad]

grase / Getty Images

32. Somali
> Ratio: 2.05
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.43

[recirclink id=912510]

philmillster / iStock via Getty Images

33. British Shorthair
> Ratio: 2.06
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.44

Ben-Schonewille / Getty Images

34. Sphynx
> Ratio: 2.07
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.45

[in-text-ad-2]

Sicha69 / iStock via Getty Images

35. Cornish Rex
> Ratio: 2.11
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.49

35. Burmese
> Ratio: 2.11
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.49

[in-text-ad]

anobis / iStock via Getty Images

37. Abyssinian
> Ratio: 2.16
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.54

[recirclink id=879078]

Leschenko / iStock via Getty Images

38. Oriental
> Ratio: 2.21
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.59

Pierre Aden / iStock via Getty Images

39. Savannah
> Ratio: 2.25
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.63

[in-text-ad-2]

CasarsaGuru / E+ via Getty Images

39. Devon Rex
> Ratio: 2.25
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.63

slowmotiongli / iStock via Getty Images

41. Havana Brown
> Ratio: 2.55
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 0.93

[in-text-ad]

Viktor / iStock via Getty Images

42. Singapura
> Ratio: 3.37
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 1.75

[recirclink id=934069]

Arx0nt / iStock via Getty Images

43. Exotic Shorthair
> Ratio: 3.83
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 2.21

Olivia7 / iStock via Getty Images

44. Persian
> Ratio: 7.49
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 5.87

[in-text-ad-2]

PetrMalyshe / Getty Images

45. Peterbald
> Ratio: 19.78
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 18.16

Kryssia Campos / Moment via Getty Images

46. Himalayan
> Ratio: 58.49
> Difference from Golden Ratio: 56.87

Photo of Douglas A. McIntyre
About the Author Douglas A. McIntyre →

Douglas A. McIntyre is the co-founder, chief executive officer and editor in chief of 24/7 Wall St. and 24/7 Tempo. He has held these jobs since 2006.

McIntyre has written thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St. He is an expert on corporate finance, the automotive industry, media companies and international finance. He has edited articles on national demographics, sports, personal income and travel.

His work has been quoted or mentioned in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, NBC News, Time, The New Yorker, HuffPost USA Today, Business Insider, Yahoo, AOL, MarketWatch, The Atlantic, Bloomberg, New York Post, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, The Guardian and many other major publications. McIntyre has been a guest on CNBC, the BBC and television and radio stations across the country.

A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College, McIntyre also was president of The Harvard Advocate. Founded in 1866, the Advocate is the oldest college publication in the United States.

TheStreet.com, Comps.com and Edgar Online are some of the public companies for which McIntyre served on the board of directors. He was a Vicinity Corporation board member when the company was sold to Microsoft in 2002. He served on the audit committees of some of these companies.

McIntyre has been the CEO of FutureSource, a provider of trading terminals and news to commodities and futures traders. He was president of Switchboard, the online phone directory company. He served as chairman and CEO of On2 Technologies, the video compression company that provided video compression software for Adobe’s Flash. Google bought On2 in 2009.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618