Obama-Era Net Neutrality Rules on Track to Be Replaced

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Obama-Era Net Neutrality Rules on Track to Be Replaced

© Thinkstock

[cnxvideo id=”506322″ placement=”ros”]Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai, who was appointed to the post by President Donald Trump earlier this year, is preparing to make good on Trump’s promise to discard the net neutrality rules the FCC adopted in 2015. Trump and Pai agree that the FCC rules are a textbook example of regulatory overreach and need to be changed.

Net neutrality is shorthand for a prohibition against charging customers more for faster internet backbone services. Internet service providers (ISPs) are now classified as common carriers, and as the rules now stand, every bit of data from whatever source is treated the same way and transferred at the same speed.

As the FCC unwinds the common carrier classification, Pai has suggested that enforcement be shifted to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). According to The Wall Street Journal:

Mr. Pai’s plans likely would reverse that reclassification eventually, so the FTC again would have jurisdiction over the telecommunications carriers. To preserve the basic tenets of net neutrality, the plans would require broadband providers to pledge to abide by net neutrality principles such as no blocking or paid prioritization of internet traffic. That would allow the FTC to go after violators for deceptive or unfair trade practices.

Such a pledge may not be legally binding, however, so Pai also wants carriers like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast to include a statement of their commitment to an “open internet” in their companies’ terms of service agreements. Such a statement would be legally binding on the providers, but on a case-by-case basis.

Furthermore, given the proclivity of businesses to include clauses in consumer contracts that substitution arbitration for judicial redress, consumers might find themselves with little actual power in the event the ISP didn’t maintain the promised “open internet.” Couple that with the near-monopoly status of internet service providers in many cities and consumers’ power is even weaker.

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618