Boeing, Air Force Shorten Test Time for New Tanker

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Boeing KC-46A with chicks
The Boeing Co.
Boeing Co. (NYSE: BA) has a contract worth more than $48 billion with the U.S. Air Force to replace 179 50-year-old KC-135 refueling tankers, but signs are starting to appear that the KC-46A tanker program is another in a growing line of Boeing’s new aircraft misadventures, including the 787 Dreamliner and the 747-8.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a review of the KC-46A program late last week. It indicates that the program cost has dropped 5.4% from $51.7 billion to $48.91 billion. That is the good news.

The less-good news is that a previous problem with the new tanker’s wiring harness caused the Air Force to delay its production decision for two months, out to October of this year. That meant changes to the test flight schedule. The GAO says:

With [U.S. Air Force] program office approval, Boeing restructured its nearly 2,400 development flight test hour plan to focus on demonstrating key KC-46 aerial refueling capabilities required for the production decision. Significantly less testing will now be conducted prior to the decision and only three test months will be on a KC-46, compared to the original plan of 13 months. This testing is intended to demonstrate design maturity and fix design and performance problems before a system enters production. Boeing remains at risk of not being able to demonstrate the aerial refueling capabilities in time to meet the new production decision date due to late parts deliveries, software defects, and flight test cycle assumptions, which could result in additional delays.

Boeing has no wriggle room in the initial development part of this contract. The Air Force is paying a maximum of $4.9 billion for this phase, and anything above that is Boeing’s problem. The Air Force program office estimates that Boeing is over budget by $1.4 billion, while Boeing claims it is just $380 million over budget.

ALSO READ: Defense Budget Has No Room for Air Force Training Jet

According to the GAO, the reduction in the total cost of the tanker program is the result of fewer engineering changes and lower construction costs to build or modify new facilities to support the planes during their development.

At the end of those three months of flight testing, the Air Force is scheduled to decide whether or not to begin building the first production models. If Boeing cannot meet that target, it almost surely will not meet its contractual obligation to deliver the first 18 production aircraft by August 2017.

Boeing is downplaying the concerns about the KC-46A, but as Leeham News and Comment points out, “Boeing has a history of denying problems right up until the point it no longer can.”

Boeing’s shares traded fractionally lower in the noon hour on Monday, at $154.37 in a 52-week range of $116.32 to $158.83.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618