Will Banks Get Stress Test Relief?

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
By Jon C. Ogg Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

It is less than a secret that banks are not the biggest fans of having to run stress tests under the current regulatory guidelines. Still, the great recession was not that long ago and many consumers and businesses are still far from fully recovered. So what happens when you hear that the Federal Reserve Board on Friday may modify its capital planning and stress testing regulations ahead?

The Federal Reserve released on Friday some proposed changes which would take effect for the 2016 capital plan and stress testing cycles. The long and short of the matter is that this looks like it is a one-year pushout for the big banks.

Friday’s Federal Reserve communication said:

The proposed rule would modify the timing for several requirements that have yet to be integrated into the stress testing framework. Banking organizations subject to the supplementary leverage ratio would begin to incorporate that ratio into their stress testing in the 2017 cycle.  The use of advanced approaches risk-weighted assets–which is applicable to banking organizations with more than $250 billion in total consolidated assets or $10 billion in on-balance sheet foreign exposures–in stress testing would be delayed indefinitely, and all banking organizations would continue to use standardized risk-weighted assets.

Banks are currently required to project post-stress regulatory capital ratios in their stress tests. The way it works now is that as the common equity tier 1 capital ratio becomes fully phased in it would generally require more capital than the tier 1 common ratio. The new proposal would remove the requirement that banking organizations calculate a tier 1 common ratio.

This is very technical of course, but the long and short of the matter is that the big banks, the so-called too big to fail banks, might have to keep slightly less in reserves in 2016 than they might have had to keep otherwise. How much that is depends upon which bank you are referring to.

Still, there may be more changes. One has to wonder what the impact is, but not too far out. The Fed further said:

The Board is also currently considering a broad range of issues related to its capital plan and stress testing rules. Any modifications will be undertaken through a separate rulemaking and would take effect no earlier than the 2017 cycle.

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
About the Author Jon C. Ogg →

Jon Ogg has been a financial news analyst since 1997. Mr. Ogg set up one of the first audio squawk box services for traders called TTN, which he sold in 2003. He has previously worked as a licensed broker to some of the top U.S. and E.U. financial institutions, managed capital, and has raised private capital at the seed and venture stage. He has lived in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as New York and Chicago, and he now lives in Houston, Texas. Jon received a Bachelor of Business Administration in finance at University of Houston in 1992. a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618