Fed’s FOMC Minutes Bring More Concern, or Confusion, Over Bond Buying and QE

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
By Jon C. Ogg Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

We have already seen Ben Bernanke testify to Congress today and the aim was to push back an immediate end to the bond buying and to even push back on the tapering efforts of continues bond purchases. Now we have the FOMC Minutes of the April 30 and May FOMC meeting and the stock market participants are using it as an excuse to take profits.

It is interesting to see that officials are open to reducing bond purchasing at the June meeting if there is evidence of strong and sustainable growth. A problem is that officials disagree on what evidence would really indicate that there is sufficient underlying growth that would remain if the bond buying was tapered. The minutes also showed that labor markets have improved since last September. That jobs market is what many Fed members want to see improving.

What you have is evidence that Fed officials are starting to think that the bond buying aspect of quantitative easing may not be helping that much. That being said, there is really only one dissenting voice among the voting members of the FOMC.

The markets have continued looking for a reason to sell off and that is what they have done. The S&P 500 is now down 8 ponts at 1,660 after having been over 1,680 this morning. The DJIA is now down about 30 points at 15,356 after having been challenged 15,550 earlier.

FULL FOMC MINUTES

The one dissenting vote is Esther George and the minutes said,

“Ms. George dissented because she continued to view monetary policy as overly accommodative and therefore as posing risks to the long-term sustainable growth of the economy. She expressed concern that the stance of policy might be fostering imbalances and excessive risk-taking in some financial markets and institutions, and she cited the potential for the Committee’s ongoing asset purchases to complicate the future conduct of policy, raise uncertainty, and affect future inflation expectations. Accordingly, Ms. George preferred to signal a near-term tapering of asset purchases, which would begin to move policy toward a more appropriate stance.”

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
About the Author Jon C. Ogg →

Jon Ogg has been a financial news analyst since 1997. Mr. Ogg set up one of the first audio squawk box services for traders called TTN, which he sold in 2003. He has previously worked as a licensed broker to some of the top U.S. and E.U. financial institutions, managed capital, and has raised private capital at the seed and venture stage. He has lived in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as New York and Chicago, and he now lives in Houston, Texas. Jon received a Bachelor of Business Administration in finance at University of Houston in 1992. a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618