Are Tanning Bed Risks the New Cigarettes?

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
By Jon C. Ogg Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

The Food & Drug Administration has just put another dark cloud over the business of tanning booths. This FDA issue is a final order which reclassifies sunlamp products and ultraviolet lamps intended for use in sunlamp products. The risk is moving up from low-risk (class I) to moderate-risk (class II) devices.

The order also requires that sunlamp products carry a visible black-box warning on the device that explicitly states that the sunlamp product should not be used on persons under the age of 18 years. Also, certain materials used in marketing of sunlamp products and UV lamps will have to include additional and specific warning statements and contraindications.

The FDA’s take is that this UV radiation may cause skin cancer. The latest FDA action also cites figures from the American Academy of Dermatology, showing that people who have been exposed to UV radiation from indoor tanning have a 59 percent increase in the risk of melanoma. The FDA also says that this risk increases each time they use a sunlamp product.

Manufacturers will now have to submit a premarket notification to the FDA, and they will have to obtain FDA clearance, before marketing the devices. The FDA’s statement included the following notes,

“The FDA’s final order for the reclassification of sunlamp products and UV lamps follows the recommendations from a panel meeting of outside experts convened in March 2010. This panel of outside experts evaluated the risks of sunlamp products, and recommended that FDA increase regulation of these devices and certain members of the panel recommended that children and teenagers not use the products. Today’s action follows a public comment period after the release of the proposed order in May 2013. The FDA received comments from industry, patient groups and professional societies, which are addressed in the final order.”

Are tanning beds worse for you than cigarettes? Probably not, but it turns out that the leathery look and feel you get in from the sun and/or from tanning booths may have more to it than nothing at all.

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
About the Author Jon C. Ogg →

Jon Ogg has been a financial news analyst since 1997. Mr. Ogg set up one of the first audio squawk box services for traders called TTN, which he sold in 2003. He has previously worked as a licensed broker to some of the top U.S. and E.U. financial institutions, managed capital, and has raised private capital at the seed and venture stage. He has lived in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as New York and Chicago, and he now lives in Houston, Texas. Jon received a Bachelor of Business Administration in finance at University of Houston in 1992. a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618