Colorado Marijuana Law Survives US Supreme Court Challenge

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Colorado Marijuana Law Survives US Supreme Court Challenge

© Thinkstock

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday announced that it will not hear a case filed by the states of Nebraska and Oklahoma against Colorado seeking to overturn Colorado’s 2012 law allowing commercial growing and distribution of marijuana in the state. The court voted six to two against hearing the suit, which was filed in December of 2014.

Because the case involves a dispute between two states it was filed directly with the Supreme Court. The ruling does not preclude Nebraska and Oklahoma from filing a similar lawsuit in federal district court.

In May of 2015, the Supreme Court asked the U.S. Solicitor General to weigh in on the case. In December the Solicitor General filed a brief that urged the Supreme Court to reject the challenge to Colorado law:

The motion for leave to file a bill of complaint should be denied because this is not an appropriate case for the exercise of this Court’s original jurisdiction. Entertaining the type of dispute at issue here — essentially that one State’s laws make it more likely that third parties will violate federal and state law in another State — would represent a substantial and unwarranted expansion of this Court’s original jurisdiction.

[recirclink id=305541]
Monday’s decision was released without comment from the majority, but Justice Clarence Thomas was joined in his dissenting opinion by Justice Samuel Alito. Thomas wrote:

The complaint, on its face, presents a ‘controvers[y] between two or more States’ that this Court alone has authority to adjudicate. The plaintiff States have alleged significant harms to their sovereign interests caused by another State. Whatever the merit of the plaintiff States’ claims, we should let this complaint proceed further rather than denying leave without so much as a word of explanation.

Colorado’s law has survived at least three other recent challenges, and with the federal government and the Obama administration continuing to maintain their distance from the controversy, the law is looking more solid every day.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618