Why California Is Giving Away Electricity

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Why California Is Giving Away Electricity

© Thinkstock

The state of California’s nameplate solar power generation capacity totaled 18,296 megawatts at the end of 2016. That’s more than six times North Carolina, the state with the second-highest capacity. California generates so much electricity from solar power that it is not only giving it away, it is paying Arizona to take it.

The state legislature has mandated that half of California’s electricity come from renewable sources by 2030. The state’s current renewable generation totals about one-quarter of the state’s demand, according to a recent report in the Los Angeles Times, due largely to the falling cost of solar panels and the panels’ greater efficiency at converting sunlight into electricity.

At the same time, the state’s regulators have continued to encourage utility companies to build more natural gas-powered generation.

According to the Times, California paid Arizona to take electricity on eight days in January and nine days in February. The number of days California would have had to dump excess solar-generated electricity would have been even higher if the state had not forced some solar plants to reduce production. This situation occurs less often in the summer when demand for cooling is higher in California.

[nativounit]

The natural gas plants were not subjected to the same forced reductions. Officials claim that cutting solar generation first is less costly and easier to do than cutting natural gas generation.

The forced reductions were needed to avoid the risk of overloading the electricity grid. If that were to happen, consumers and businesses could experience blackouts.

For Californians, who already pay about 50% more for electricity than the national average, the disconnect between the legislature and the utility regulators is costly. Partly that’s due to the way regulation works. When a new gas-fired plant and its accompanying transmission lines are approved, the utility doing the project is allowed to charge ratepayers for the new construction. Thus, if the system is overbuilt, customers pay more whether the electricity is used or not.

Some overlap is necessary due simply to the fact that solar plants only generate electricity when the sun is shining. But better battery technology could soon eliminate this shortcoming, and the battle between natural gas generation and solar generation will tip even more toward solar, turning new natural gas plants into white elephants that California consumers will be paying for even as they might have to close down.

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618