Microsoft and Yahoo! Have Little to Lose in Tying the Knot

Photo of Douglas A. McIntyre
By Douglas A. McIntyre Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

From Chad Brand of Peridot Capitalist

There are plenty of reasons why the rumored deal that would have Microsoft (MSFT) acquiring Yahoo! (YHOO) for $50 billion is not a good idea. In general, large tech deals rarely work. The history of failures is very long; Compaq-HP, AOL-Time Warner, Symantec-Veritas to name a few. Company cultures in Silicon Valley are typically very hard to mesh. Going from evil competitor to lifelong companion doesn’t happen overnight too easily. In fact, for AOL Time Warner it never worked. The two sides hated each other from the start and the result was, according to many, the biggest failed merger of all time.

Add to that Microsoft’s preference against big deals and an outright merger of the two companies seems pretty unlikely. Not to mention a price of $50 billion is outrageous and would be extremely dilutive. However, given where they both are right now, I can’t help but think that there would be nothing to lose. Sure, the odds are high that the deal would never bear the kind of fruit that the optimists would hope for. But that doesn’t mean it is a bad idea.

From Microsoft’s perspective, they are probably shocked that despite having a near monopoly on the computer desktop, they still have yet to become an integral part of the user’s online experience. Windows and Office represent nearly all their profit. An inability to smoothly integrate their desktop applications and online applications is a huge failure on their part. Instead, people are using Google (GOOG) and other software to manage their online activities and search for content they need. You can certainly argue that just adding Yahoo services won’t necessarily change that, but perhaps the two sides working together can be more successful at turning Internet Explorer users into money-making customers.

From the Yahoo angle, they are obviously trying hard to regain some of the market share they have lost to Google. Combining with Microsoft would give them more reach and added capability to try and regain their relevancy. The potential of a Microsoft-Yahoo! team is obviously overwhelming.

Given the history of failed tech mergers and difficulty integrating vastly competitive corporate cultures, there are certainly reasons to believe that Microsoft and Yahoo! together would be no more adept at boosting their online presence than the two firms were able to accomplish alone. That said, I have to think that they have very little to lose by giving it a try. The worst case scenario, in my mind, would be no progress. And who knows, just because something is difficult doesn’t mean it is impossible.

Talks of any kind are clearly in the early stages, so it’s way too early to speculate on a deal happening, despite the move in Yahoo stock today. At this point I’d put the odds of a deal at no better than 50/50 but if I were advising them, I would make sure they thought long and hard about it. If they just dismiss it as joining with the enemy, which appears to be how talks between the two sides have gone in the past, it could be a missed opportunity to eat into Google’s lead.

Full Disclosure: Long Google and short Yahoo! at the time of writing

http://www.peridotcapitalist.com/

Photo of Douglas A. McIntyre
About the Author Douglas A. McIntyre →

Douglas A. McIntyre is the co-founder, chief executive officer and editor in chief of 24/7 Wall St. and 24/7 Tempo. He has held these jobs since 2006.

McIntyre has written thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St. He is an expert on corporate finance, the automotive industry, media companies and international finance. He has edited articles on national demographics, sports, personal income and travel.

His work has been quoted or mentioned in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, NBC News, Time, The New Yorker, HuffPost USA Today, Business Insider, Yahoo, AOL, MarketWatch, The Atlantic, Bloomberg, New York Post, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, The Guardian and many other major publications. McIntyre has been a guest on CNBC, the BBC and television and radio stations across the country.

A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College, McIntyre also was president of The Harvard Advocate. Founded in 1866, the Advocate is the oldest college publication in the United States.

TheStreet.com, Comps.com and Edgar Online are some of the public companies for which McIntyre served on the board of directors. He was a Vicinity Corporation board member when the company was sold to Microsoft in 2002. He served on the audit committees of some of these companies.

McIntyre has been the CEO of FutureSource, a provider of trading terminals and news to commodities and futures traders. He was president of Switchboard, the online phone directory company. He served as chairman and CEO of On2 Technologies, the video compression company that provided video compression software for Adobe’s Flash. Google bought On2 in 2009.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618