Fiscal Cliff “Deeply Destructive” to U.S. — Obama

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

If Congress does not act to counter the impact of the looming fiscal cliff — the $110 billion spending cuts that will go into effect on January 2, 2013 — will have severe effects according to a report from the Obama administration Office of Management and Budget:

Sequestration would be deeply destructive to national security, domestic investments and core government functions.

The automatic cuts, technically called “sequestration,” would chop 2% from payments to Medicare providers, about 9.4% from the U.S. defense budget, and non-defense discretionary would lose about 8.2%. Under the deal struck last year, similar cuts are scheduled to be applied annually through budget year 2021.

The budget cuts are to be combined with the expiration of the Bush administration’s tax cuts, which also expire at the end of 2012, to force a reduction in the federal budget deficit. Neither Democrats nor Republicans favors sequestration, but the dispute over raising taxes for high-income earners has so far precluded a solution acceptable to both sides.

There is little likelihood that any solution will be reached before the November elections, and the short time between then and the end of the year doesn’t augur well for a post-election solution either. At best, a post-election lame-duck session could delay the country’s tumble off the fiscal cliff for a short time to give the next President and Congress time to work out a solution.

Of course if Obama wins, the status quo ante will likely be maintained, even if Republicans win control of the Senate and maintain control of the House. If, as seems very unlikely, the Democrats should control both the White House and both houses of Congress, well, that would be a different story. A Romney win could cause similar confusion unless the Republicans gain control of Congress.

Paul Ausick

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618