The 5% Yield Is Tempting But You Should Know Something Before Buying

Photo of Michael Williams
By Michael Williams Published

Quick Read

  • KMLM delivered just 2.5% total return over the past year while the S&P 500 returned nearly eight times more.

  • The fund’s distributions stem from futures trading gains and fluctuate wildly based on market trends rather than stable dividend payments.

  • DBMF offers a larger alternative with $2B in assets versus KMLM’s $170M and simpler 1099 tax reporting instead of K-1 forms.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
The 5% Yield Is Tempting But You Should Know Something Before Buying

© 24/7 Wall St.

The KraneShares Mount Lucas Managed Futures Index Strategy ETF (NYSEARCA:KMLM) offers a 5% dividend yield based on its most recent annual distribution. However, investors considering this ETF for income should understand the dividend’s headline number masks significant instability and disappointing total returns.

How KMLM Generates Income

KMLM doesn’t generate income like traditional dividend ETFs. It tracks the KFA Mount Lucas Index through a trend-following managed futures strategy investing in 22 futures contracts across commodities, currencies, and global fixed income markets. Distributions represent trading gains from futures positions, not dividend payments from stocks. When the strategy captures price trends, it generates profits distributed to shareholders. When trends reverse or markets remain range-bound, distributions plummet.

The fund’s dividend history reveals extreme instability that undermines its appeal as an income investment. Last December’s distribution surged compared to the prior year, yet remained far below the 2022 peak when commodity trends were exceptionally strong. This volatility stems from the fund’s reliance on capturing price trends in futures markets. When trends reverse, distributions collapse.

The Total Return Reality Check

The 5% yield headline masks disappointing performance when examining total returns. Over the past year, KMLM delivered just 2.5% when combining dividends with price changes. This weak performance stems from the fund’s reliance on capturing futures market trends, which failed to materialize consistently. The result: distributions barely compensated for capital losses as the strategy struggled in range-bound markets.

Traditional equity exposure would have served investors far better. The S&P 500 delivered nearly eight times KMLM’s return over the past year, demonstrating the substantial opportunity cost of choosing managed futures for income. This performance gap persists over longer periods, highlighting how KMLM’s crisis-hedging design conflicts with its use as an income vehicle.

The fund’s managed futures approach is designed for portfolio diversification and crisis hedging, not stable income generation. During the 2022 inflation surge and market volatility, KMLM excelled with strong gains. But in calmer markets, the strategy struggled with disappointing returns. Investors chasing the 5% yield are buying a volatility hedge while expecting it to function as an income vehicle. This represents a fundamental mismatch.

Consider DBMF for More Consistent Managed Futures Exposure

For investors genuinely interested in managed futures exposure, the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (BATS:DBMF) offers a compelling alternative. With $2 billion in assets versus KMLM’s $170 million, DBMF provides better liquidity and more institutional backing since its 2019 launch. The fund’s distributions have shown less extreme volatility than KMLM’s wild swings, though they still fluctuate with market trends.

DBMF offers practical advantages beyond performance. The current yield stands near 4%, and the fund uses simpler 1099 tax reporting rather than K-1 forms that complicate year-end filing for investors.

KMLM’s 5% yield is tempting only if you ignore the unstable distribution history and disappointing total returns. Managed futures belong in portfolios as diversifiers, not income generators. Typically 5-10% allocations rather than core holdings.

Photo of Michael Williams
About the Author Michael Williams →

I am a long time investor and student of business, and believe finding good companies that can become great investments is the best game on earth. After 20 years of writing and researching the public markets it is clear that individuals have never had more tools and information to take control of their financial lives. From ETFs and $0 commissions to cryptos and prediction markets there has never been a greater democratization of access to investing. 

I write to help people understand the investments available to them so they can make the best choice for their portfolio, whether they're starting out or looking for income in retirement. 

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618