Is the Stalled Nvidia-OpenAI Megadeal AI’s First Domino to Fall?

Photo of Rich Duprey
By Rich Duprey Published

Quick Read

  • Nvidia (NVDA) stalled its $100B OpenAI partnership amid doubts about transaction size and business discipline.

  • Nvidia investments in partners that then buy Nvidia chips raise circular financing concerns.

  • OpenAI maintains $1.4T in potential commitments across Microsoft, Amazon, Oracle and AMD partnerships.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Is the Stalled Nvidia-OpenAI Megadeal AI’s First Domino to Fall?

© Martin Barraud / Getty Images

Last September, Nvidia (NASDAQ:NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction) and OpenAI lit up the AI world with the announcement of a letter of intent for a “landmark strategic partnership” to deploy at least 10 gigawatts of Nvidia systems, backed by up to $100 billion of progressive investment as capacity came online. 

The agreement, though, was explicitly non‑binding and was dependent on infrastructure milestones such as data center and power build‑out. It also sat alongside a broader web of OpenAI arrangements and talks that, across cloud partners, chipmakers, and financial investors, have been reported to total approximately $1.4 trillion in potential commitments over multiple years. 

However, The Wall Street Journal yesterday reported that Nvidia’s $100 billion plan had stalled amid internal doubts about the size and structure of the transaction and questions about OpenAI’s business discipline and competitive risks. Considering the interconnectedness of many of OpenAI’s agreements — and the criticism that Nvidia engages in a form of circular financing with its own deals — is this the loose thread that, once pulled, unravels the entire AI boom?

OpenAI’s Web of Megadeals

OpenAI’s position today is anchored in a dense network of partners and funding discussions that go far beyond any single Nvidia deal. Among the most prominent:

  • Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) Azure: An incremental $250 billion commitment from OpenAI to purchase Azure cloud services for AI training and inference over several years.
  • Amazon (NASDAQ:AMZN) AWS: A seven-year $38 billion cloud computing partnership providing OpenAI access to AWS infrastructure (including Nvidia-equipped servers) for demanding AI workloads.
  • Oracle (NYSE:ORCL): A five-year, $300 billion agreement for cloud computing capacity and infrastructure that ties into the $500 billion Stargate Project to support OpenAI’s next-generation models.
  • CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV): A $22 billion agreement for data center and GPU access — often Nvidia-powered — supporting OpenAI’s cloud needs.
  • Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD): A multi-year deal to supply around 6 GW of GPU capacity, potentially valued up to $300 billion. OpenAI would also receive warrants for a 10% stake in AMD if  certain targets are met.

On top of those strategic partners, OpenAI is also reportedly seeking up to $100 billion in fresh funding at a valuation around $830 billion, with potential contributions from Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, SoftBank, and Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds. 

In that context, the “up to $100 billion” Nvidia letter of intent was a cornerstone, but not OpenAI’s entire foundation.

Circular Financing Fears

Many of Nvidia’s deals have been criticized as a form of vendor financing. For example, Nvidia would invest huge sums in OpenAI, which then commits to lease or buy vast quantities of Nvidia chips. As Nvidia is also a major backer of CoreWeave — which buys Nvidia GPUs — it builds out data centers and then sells capacity to OpenAI and others.

This loop has led some observers to worry that revenues are being propped up by circularly financed demand rather than independent, sustainable economics. Nvidia rejects that characterization, emphasizing long‑standing commercial relationships and real, growing end‑user usage of AI services.

At first glance, the stalled $100 billion plan looks exactly like the scenario critics feared: if Nvidia pulls back its investment, perhaps OpenAI scales back its demand for CoreWeave’s capacity, which then reduces CoreWeave’s need for Nvidia chips. Rejecting an OpenAI investment means Nvidia just knocked over the first domino in the AI boom.

Why This Isn’t Fatal to OpenAI — or the AI Boom

Several facts argue strongly against this view. First, the megadeal was non‑binding from the start. It was a letter of intent, not a signed obligation, that was contingent on deployment of 10 gigawatts of systems and associated infrastructure. OpenAI is also already in talks to raise up to $100 billion, with a significant portion expected from Microsoft, Amazon, Nvidia (at a reduced scale), SoftBank, and sovereign investors. The Nvidia shift changes the mix and terms, but not the existence of deep, competing pools of capital.

Demand for AI compute remains intense and megaprojects can be phased in. Multi‑gigawatt projects like the ones OpenAI discussed with Nvidia and data center partners are modular, so if one investor balks at funding the entire program at once, they can be built out in stages tied to utilization and revenue milestones instead of cancelled outright.

Key Takeaway

The Nvidia–OpenAI megadeal may end up smaller than advertised, or even be replaced by a patchwork of investments from multiple players, but that does not mean the AI gold rush is ending. If anything, it underscores that the ecosystem is broad, that OpenAI has many potential backers, and that partners will increasingly demand clearer paths to returns as the sector matures. 

The boom in AI infrastructure and applications remains intact; what is changing is the willingness of even the biggest beneficiaries, like Nvidia, to keep writing blank checks. That looks less like the first domino falling and more like the AI era moving from exuberant promises into a more sober, long‑term growth phase.

Photo of Rich Duprey
About the Author Rich Duprey →

After two decades of patrolling the dark corners of suburbia as a police officer, Rich Duprey hung up his badge and gun to begin writing full time about stocks and investing. For the past 20 years he’s been cruising the markets looking for companies to lock up as long-term holdings in a portfolio while writing extensively on the broad sectors of consumer goods, technology, and industrials. Because his experience isn’t from the typical financial analyst track, Rich is able to break down complex topics into understandable and useful action points for the average investor. His writings have appeared on The Motley Fool, InvestorPlace, Yahoo! Finance, and Money Morning. He has been interviewed for both U.S. and international publications, including MarketWatch, Financial Times, Forbes, Fast Company, and USA Today.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618