BITU’s Decay Problem: Why This Bitcoin ETF Lost 31% While Bitcoin Fell Just 10%

Photo of Austin Smith
By Austin Smith Published

Quick Read

  • Volatility decay erodes returns when Bitcoin moves sideways or reverses: a 50% Bitcoin drawdown would near-total wipeout the leveraged fund.

  • BITU works only for single-day trades or strong uptrends; buy-and-hold investors face compounding losses from daily resets in choppy markets.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
BITU’s Decay Problem: Why This Bitcoin ETF Lost 31% While Bitcoin Fell Just 10%

© K.unshu / Shutterstock.com

ProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (NYSEARCA:BITU) gives traders 2x daily exposure to the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index through swaps, with a 0.98% expense ratio. The appeal is simple: when Bitcoin moves, BITU moves twice as hard, without the hassle of holding crypto directly. The structure is complex, and the gap between what holders expect and what they get is where the real risk lives.

The decay problem in plain numbers

BITU resets daily. The fund delivers 2x of one trading day’s Bitcoin return, then starts over. Compounded across many days, results diverge from a static 2x of Bitcoin’s cumulative move, and the divergence almost always works against the holder when the path is choppy.

The current numbers make the case more clearly than any textbook. Year to date, Bitcoin is down 10%. A naive 2x would imply roughly a 21% loss for BITU. Actual BITU performance year to date: down 31%. Over the trailing year, Bitcoin is down 17%, while BITU is down 53%. The shortfall versus a clean 2x is the decay tax, paid daily in the form of compounding through volatility.

The mechanism is arithmetic. If Bitcoin falls 10% then rises 10%, it ends below where it started. BITU falls 20% then rises 20%, which leaves an even larger hole. Bitcoin’s 37% five-year return compares to BITU’s 40% loss since its 2024 inception. That is the same asset class, leveraged, going the opposite direction over a multi-year window.

BITU’s recent rip illustrates the other side. Bitcoin gained 16% in the past month in a relatively clean trend, and BITU returned 30%, close to a true 2x. Trending markets reward leverage. Choppy markets punish it.

The drawdown amplifier sitting underneath

The secondary risk is the underlying asset itself. Bitcoin has repeatedly delivered 50%-plus drawdowns in its history. A straight-line 50% Bitcoin decline implies a near-total wipeout for a 2x daily product, and a volatile 50% decline is worse because decay stacks on top of the directional loss.

Financing is the smaller, slower drag. BITU’s swaps are priced off short-term funding costs. The Fed funds rate sits at 3.75% after 75 basis points of cuts over the past year, and the 10-year Treasury yields 4.40%. Financing costs remain manageable but meaningful, and they accrue every day the swap is open.

What to monitor and where to find it

  1. Bitcoin 30-day realized volatility. Deribit’s DVOL index and T3’s BitVol track this directly. Sustained readings above roughly 60 annualized suggest a regime where decay accelerates. Check weekly.
  2. The VIX as a cross-asset volatility tell. The VIX is almost 17, down from a 31 spike on March 27, 2026. A move back above 25 historically coincides with crypto choppiness. FRED publishes daily.
  3. Bitcoin spot price action. Trend versus chop matters more than direction. CoinGecko or Coinbase show daily ranges; consecutive 3%-plus daily reversals are the decay setup.
  4. Fed policy and the 10-year yield. CME FedWatch for meeting probabilities, FRED for DGS10. A renewed climb above the 12-month high of 4.58% would tighten swap economics.
  5. ProShares fund page. Watch for changes to swap counterparties or expense structure on the BITU summary prospectus.

The bottom line for holders

BITU works as designed for a single trading day. Held longer, it is a wager that Bitcoin trends in one direction without major reversals, and the historical record on that is poor. The one-year gap between a 17% Bitcoin decline and a 53% BITU decline is the cost of the structure, paid by anyone who treated it as buy-and-hold Bitcoin exposure with extra punch. Position size and holding period should be calibrated accordingly.

Photo of Austin Smith
About the Author Austin Smith →

Austin Smith is a financial publisher with over two decades of experience in the markets. He spent over a decade at The Motley Fool as a senior editor for Fool.com, portfolio advisor for Millionacres, and launched new brands in the personal finance and real estate investing space.

His work has been featured on Fool.com, NPR, CNBC, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, AOL, Marketwatch, and many other publications. Today he writes for 24/7 Wall St and covers equities, REITs, and ETFs for readers. He is as an advisor to private companies, and co-hosts The AI Investor Podcast.

When not looking for investment opportunities, he can be found skiing, running, or playing soccer with his children. Learn more about me here.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

WAT Vol: 2,131,048
INTC Vol: 198,362,091
AKAM Vol: 8,677,900
MU Vol: 64,268,462
QCOM Vol: 34,272,223

Top Losing Stocks

HII Vol: 1,746,810
POOL Vol: 2,311,870
APTV Vol: 10,166,405
LDOS Vol: 2,252,442
PYPL Vol: 39,099,369