Dish Network Prevails in Ad-Skipping Appeal

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Satellite TV
Thinkstock
Ever since Dish Network Corp. (NASDAQ: DISH) introduced its ad-skipping technology called the “Hopper”, network TV operators have been seeking to kill the beast. No luck so far, though, as a federal appeals court upheld a lower court ruling telling the networks to go pound sand.

The suit was brought against Dish by Fox Broadcasting and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., now part of Twenty-First Century Fox Inc. (NASDAQ: FOXA), since the split with News Corp. (NASDAQ: NWSA). In rejecting the original request for an injunction against Dish, the court said that its is unlikely that Fox would suffer irreparable harm as a result of ad-skipping Hopper. The appeals court agreed.

This is the second major defeat for network broadcasters in the past few months. In April, a group of broadcasters including CBS Corp. (NYSE: CBS), The Walt Disney Co. (NYSE: DIS), which owns the ABC television network, and Comcast Corp. (NASDAQ: CMCSA), which owns the NBC network, and others against Aereo Inc., which is backed by Barry Diller, the CEO of IAC/InteractiveCorp (NASDAQ: IACI). Aereo made the news earlier this week because Cablevision Systems Corp. (NYSE: CVC) plans to suggest Aereo as a replacement for CBS network programming to its 3 million New York City customers if the cable provider can’t reach a new retransmission deal with the network.

Fox still has a chance to get a ruling in its favor because today’s ruling only applies to injunctive relief. The issue of whether or not Dish violated the terms of its distribution deal with Fox has not yet been fully decided. The district court said Fox “has a good argument” that Dish’s PrimeTime Anytime service, which creates the ad-free programming that is available on the Hopper, is “similar” to time-delayed, interactive, or video-on-demand programming and is, therefore, expressly prohibited by the contract between Fox and Dish. Fox has not indicated whether or not it will pursue this issue, but having come this far it’s hard to believe the network won’t.

The battle for control of the living room continues and the only thing that could make it more entertaining would be if the prices for all this programming would fall. That, however, is not likely.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618