TV Sports Not Important to More Than Half of Americans

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
TV Sports Not Important to More Than Half of Americans

© Thinkstock

For years the single most expensive piece of a pay-TV subscription has been the sports programming offered by cable and satellite providers. These companies pay ever-higher fees to sports leagues like the NFL, MLB and the NBA because, for years, sports programming could easily be characterized as the most valuable content in the world. No one (or, at least, not millions of people) wants to watch the seventh game of the World Series the day after it’s played.

But sports is event-driven and if there is no big event (the NBA finals, for example), most people don’t tune in to the sports channels. A new survey by a cord-cutting website CutCableToday.com indicates that 56% of U.S. pay-TV subscribers rarely or never watch sports programming on Walt Disney Co.’s (NYSE: DIS) ESPN channels. Of the total surveyed, 30% never watch ESPN and 26% watch less than once a month. Just 8% said they watch ESPN daily.

In fact, nearly a third of those surveyed said that having access to a live sports channel was “very unimportant” to them and another 20% said it was either “somewhat unimportant” or they were “neutral/not sure.”

[nativounit]

Sports programming now makes up about 40% of a cable/satellite provider’s costs, according to a report last December in the Los Angeles Times. ESPN costs an average of $7.20 a month. Adding in regional sports programming is expected to drive the cost of an average consumer’s pay-TV bill to $18.37 a month this year.

On Wednesday, TiVo Corp. (NASDAQ: TIVO) released its first-quarter video trends report including a breakdown of the top channels that respondents to its survey want to have in an á la carte pay TV package. The top five were ABC, CBS, Discovery, NBC and the History channel. ESPN ranked 16th, barely within the average of 19 channels that respondents said they would like to have in their ideal packages. More than 75% of respondents would like the ability to create their own bundle of channels, something that the pay-TV providers have shown little interest in doing.

U.S. consumers say they are willing to pay an average of $28.31 a month for their top 20 channels. If sports programming is costing nearly a third of that and more than half of subscribers don’t want it, the pay-TV providers are in a serious bind.

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618