Our combined income is $700k a year, but the work hours are relentless – is a sabbatical the answer?

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Key Points

  • This Redditor is hoping to find a way to make his life a little easier rather than working three jobs.

  • The challenge is that this Redditor also has plans to retire by 40, contrary to the idea of taking a sabbatical.

  • There is also the consideration of his wife setting up her own business, which will take up a lot of time.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Our combined income is $700k a year, but the work hours are relentless – is a sabbatical the answer?

© Eviart / Shutterstock.com

It’s an unfortunate truth that at some point, everyone needs to step away from work for a bit of rest. Whether you are in a cushy blue-collar job, there is always a breaking point at which you need to take a step away. For those in the FIRE world who want to push themselves to save as much as possible, it often comes at the cost of working too much. 

In the case of one corporate-working Redditor posting in r/fatFIRE, there is a concern that they have been working so hard at a young age that they are considering taking a “sabbatical FIRE.” The whole idea of taking a sabbatical for someone in their 20s might seem pretty crazy, but this is exactly what the Redditor is considering anyway. 

Twelve Hours A Day

The 29-year-old Redditor and his wife, 27, are in an enviable financial position for their age. With a $2 million net worth, they have a pretty excellent start on putting money away for the future. This is helped by the combined $700,000 household income, allowing them to put away around $400,000 annually in savings. 

The couple lives in a town with a moderate cost of living. The wife works and earns around $200,000 in a “fairly easy” role, while the Redditor works for a FAANG company and earns $250,000 while also moonlighting in two other 1099 roles that earn a combined $250,000. 

Adding to this whole challenge is that the Redditor’s wife is working on setting up her own business. While this business isn’t profitable yet, the couple still wants to keep moving on this. Adding to the mix as yet another complication is that the couple is looking at a potential scenario where, if all fails, they can move back to the wife’s parents’ property in another country and live rent-free. 

Why A Sabbatical? 

Regarding why a sabbatical is even on the table, the original post is from 5 AM to 5 PM daily, as half of his team works overseas, while his team is California-based. Given this, he’s “basically online all day” and is burned out as soon as 5 PM turns out. The challenge is that he has other gigs that he needs to handle in the evening, so it’s nonstop. 

Is A Sabbatical The Right Answer? 

Understandably, the Redditor feels overwhelmed with work and believes life passes him by. However, the challenge here is that the Redditor is arguing two conflicting points of view. On the one hand, they have enough money to take a sabbatical if that’s the decision they make. On the other hand, if they want to retire at 40, taking a sabbatical will make that impossible if they’re going to hit a $10 million target number. 

Sabbatical or not, there is one argument here that cannot be overlooked, and it might not be as accurate as the Redditor believes it is. He believes that tech and finance, the respective career areas of the couple, are not going anywhere. While this is true from a role perspective, there is no guarantee they can find equally strong-paying jobs in the future, as plenty of others will be looking to take this work. 

Knowing this, walking away now seems like an ill-advised idea that stems more from an overworked Redditor who just needs a break. Instead of the sabbatical, take a month-long vacation, even if it’s unpaid, if you can work out something with your boss. Stepping away from all this earning potential right now, in prime earning years, just seems like a move that could have significant and unforeseen impacts on the overall desire to walk away when they turn 40. 

There might be no question that the Redditor needs to find a better balance, so this might mean working less on the non-W2 work and taking a bit of an income hit. However, walking away from it all completely is going to be something they will regret in the future. It’s better to work now and save your best years for down the road. 

The couple’s three-month-old won’t remember if dad is busy working right now, and as long as you make time as they get older, there are millions of memories still to be made. Even if more children are on the horizon, you can put away all of the money you will ever need in the next decade and then have the golden years start in your 40s, leaving plenty of time to spend with kids. 

 

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618