Why Sprint Was Just Called a Tactical Short

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
By Jon C. Ogg Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Why Sprint Was Just Called a Tactical Short

© Thinkstock

Sprint Corp. (NYSE: S) has seen its share of ups and down. Despite being down 37% from its highs in the past year, the company’s stock actually is still up about 50% from its 52-week lows. Pacific Crest has warned against any enthusiasm here. In fact, the firm touted Sprint as a “tactical short.”

Wednesday’s top analyst upgrades and downgrades showed that Sprint was downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight. The firm’s Michael Bowen indicated that tightening credit standards will lower expected subscriber additions. Perhaps the biggest warning is that Sprint’s discounted pricing is not helping it win in competition with T-Mobile and against Verizon and AT&T.

Pacific Crest also admitted that its subscriber estimates were initially too high. That being said, the analyst has warned that Sprint’s 2016 guidance perhaps should not be taken at face value. The following data were shown for the first quarter:

  • Bowen had originally expected 490,000 postpaid net additions.
  • He trimmed revenue expectations from $8 billion down to $7.88 billion.
  • He raised EBITDA estimates to $1.99 billion from $1.80 billion.
  • Consensus estimates were $8.05 billion in revenues and $1.95 billion in EBITDA.

For all of 2016, Bowen lowered Sprint’s revenue estimate to $32.02 billion from his prior $32.81 billion estimate. EBITDA for 2016 was lowered to $9.46 billion from a prior $9.62 billion. Both are under consensus estimates.
[recirclink id=325733]
Pacific Crest’s report warns that the continued aggressive 50% off promotion still will generate disappointing numbers regarding post-paid additions and churn versus expectations.

As far as why Sprint’s rating was cut to Underweight, this should sum it up pretty well:

Sprint’s lack of competitive tools other than price suggests fundamental issues. If 50-percent off isn’t working, what will?

Bowen may not be alone in wondering about Sprint’s new efforts for a sale-leaseback for handsets and its network. His fear is that Sprint is effectively using its new proceeds from the leases to pay off its coming debt maturities. The fear here is that Sprint is mortgaging its future.

Thomson Reuters shows that only three analysts have Buy or Strong Buy ratings on Sprint. A whopping 19 analysts have Hold (neutral) ratings, followed by three Sell and five Strong Sell ratings. The average target price is $3.47, which is down from $3.55 in mid-February and from $4.15 in mid-January.

Sprint shares were down 2.7% at $3.39, with some 16 million shares traded midday Wednesday. An intraday low of $3.30 was seen in earlier trading. Sprint has a 52-week range of $2.18 to $5.39.

As far as being a “tactical short,” Pacific Crest may not be alone. Sprint’s short interest on March 31 was some 200.7 million shares.

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
About the Author Jon C. Ogg →

Jon Ogg has been a financial news analyst since 1997. Mr. Ogg set up one of the first audio squawk box services for traders called TTN, which he sold in 2003. He has previously worked as a licensed broker to some of the top U.S. and E.U. financial institutions, managed capital, and has raised private capital at the seed and venture stage. He has lived in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as New York and Chicago, and he now lives in Houston, Texas. Jon received a Bachelor of Business Administration in finance at University of Houston in 1992. a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618