The Real Meaning of Tesla’s Over-the-Air Brake Fix

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
The Real Meaning of Tesla’s Over-the-Air Brake Fix

© courtesy of Tesla Motors Corp.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Last week, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. (NYSE: FCAU) recalled 4.8 million vehicles to fix a problem with the cruise control. Owners will be notified that their vehicle is affected and they will have to take the car to a dealer where a software fix will be made.

The week before, Consumer Reports failed to recommend the Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) Model 3 because the vehicle’s braking distance did not meet the magazine’s standards. Then Tesla pushed out an over-the-air (OTA) software fix to all its Model 3s and the car’s braking distance was shortened by 19 feet, enough to meet the Consumer Reports standard and earn the magazine’s recommendation.

Chrysler’s fix will cost the company money and vehicle owners some time, while Tesla’s fix was essentially free both to the company and to the car owners. Partly that’s due to state laws the forbid automakers from taking repair work away from dealerships. Tesla has no dealerships.

[nativounit]

And while there’s no argument that Tesla’s OTA capability is cheaper and more convenient, the braking problem and its fix raise some important questions. The most difficult one for the company to answer may be why Tesla sells a vehicle with a problem that can be so easily fixed. Did the company not even consider braking distance during its testing? Apparently not. What does that say about the company’s commitment to safety?

A more important question may be whether Tesla owners (and more important for the company, potential Tesla owners) willing to exchange safety for convenience. Perhaps “safety” is the wrong word. “Integrity” may be closer to the mark.

Consumers already have accepted the fact that a cell phone can track movement and location and are willing to provide that data to phonemakers, cell phone networks and advertisers in exchange for the convenience and power of a smartphone. Are they just as likely to trade their trust in an automaker for convenience?

No one knows why the Model 3’s original braking distance was so long, except perhaps a few engineers at Tesla. If the company didn’t know about the issue when it sold the cars, why didn’t it? If it did, why did it not fix the issue before selling the car? Does it matter now that the company has fixed the issue? Yes, it should matter.

[recirclink id=468219]

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618