California Governor Signs Bill Creating ‘Sanctuary’ State, in Rebuke to Trump

Photo of John Harrington
By John Harrington Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
California Governor Signs Bill Creating ‘Sanctuary’ State, in Rebuke to Trump

© Wikimedia Commons

Governor Jerry Brown Thursday signed legislation to make California a “sanctuary’’ state, inviting possible retaliation from President Trump.

In signing the bill, Brown limited who state and local law enforcement agencies can hold, question and transfer at the request of federal immigration authorities in the nation’s largest state.

Twenty-seven percent of California residents are foreign-born, the highest percentage of any state. Some estimates put the number of illegal immigrants in California at 2.3 million, or about one-fifth of the estimated illegal immigrants in the United States

Other states, such as Connecticut, Colorado and New Mexico, call themselves sanctuary states. But Brown’s decision to sign the measure, as well as writing a signing measure in support of the measure that takes effect in January, ratchets up the possibility of a confrontation with the federal government. The measure has been criticized by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who called the legislation “unconscionable.”

[nativounit]

In his message, Brown said the bill, titled the California Values Act, states that local authorities will not ask about immigration status during routine interactions. It also bans unconstitutional detainer requests and prohibits the commandeering of local officials to do the work of immigration agents.

“These are uncertain times for undocumented Californians and their families,” Brown wrote in his message, “and this bill strikes a balance that will protect public safety, while bringing a measure of comfort to those families who are now living in fear every day.”

Federal immigration authorities will still be able to work with state corrections officials and to enter county jails to question immigrants.

Sanctuaries have been battling the administration over its attempts to cut federal grant funding from “sanctuary jurisdictions” that limit how local enforcement agencies can interact with immigrants.

The issue moved to the forefront of the national debate over immigration five days after the president was sworn in when he signed an executive order to block federal funding to sanctuary cities.

On Thursday, Department of Justice spokesman Devin O’Malley declined to comment on the agency’s next move.

The term sanctuary has been used to describe locations — states, cities, counties and other jurisdictions — that limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal agencies that enforce immigration laws.

Estimates for the number of sanctuary cities and counties vary from 165 to more than 600. There were already 35 sanctuary cities in California before Brown signed the bill Thursday.

Trying to determine the number of sanctuary cities is tricky, a problem the Department of Homeland Security encountered earlier this year. The federal agency tried to create a list of sanctuary cities in an effort to target those municipalities it believed were not cooperating with federal authorities to deport undocumented immigrants. The DHS suspended its sanctuary city report in April after some jurisdictions objected when they were included on the list.

Sanctuary opponents claim these jurisdictions allow criminals among undocumented immigrants to go free, leading to crimes that could have been prevented if the undocumented immigrants had been deported. Opponents also say undocumented immigrants put financial burdens on towns and drive down wages.

Those who support sanctuary communities say they protect families from being broken up by deportations of undocumented immigrants. Supporters also maintain that deporting undocumented immigrants alienates legal immigrant communities.

The undocumented population includes those who entered the country legally but overstayed the terms of their temporary visit. Being illegally present in the United States has always been a civil, not criminal, violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of John Harrington
About the Author John Harrington →

I'm a journalist who started my career as a sportswriter, covering professional, college, and high school sports. I pivoted into business news, working for the biggest newspapers in New Jersey, including The Record, Star-Ledger and Asbury Park Press. I was an editor at the weekly publication Crain’s New York Business and served on several editorial teams at Bloomberg News. I’ve been a part of 24/7 Wall St. since 2017, writing about politics, history, sports, health, the environment, finance, culture, breaking news, and current events. I'm a graduate of Rutgers University with a Bachelor of Arts degree in History.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618