Why Investors Dumped Chesapeake Energy Shares Wednesday

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Why Investors Dumped Chesapeake Energy Shares Wednesday

© Thinkstock

Oil and gas producer Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE: CHK) saw shares drop by about 6.8% in the noon hour Wednesday after the company said earlier in the morning that it had increased the size of a five-year term loan from $1.0 billion to $1.5 billion at an interest rate of Libor plus 7.5% subject to a Libor floor rate of 1%. The company plans to use the proceeds to finance tender offers for unsecured notes. Essentially, the five-year loan improves the company’s financial flexibility by eliminating some debt that is near maturity.

This is another step on the company’s path toward reducing the weight of its massive debt load. Last week Chesapeake shed the last of its properties in the Barnett Shale play in north Texas, reducing its future midstream and downstream commitments by $1.9 billion. Wednesday’s debt sale will also help pay some $400 million to Williams Partners L.P. (NYSE: WPZ) for projected shortfalls in minimum volume commitments.

So why were investors down on the stock Wednesday? The idea that Chesapeake has to borrow more money to pay off debt often has little appeal to investors. In Chesapeake’s defense, however, the new borrowing will add to its cash flow and buy more time for the company to benefit from an increase in the price of natural gas.

And when will that happen? Maybe as early as this winter, as natural gas exports (as liquefied natural gas, or LNG) increase with the startup of the second production train at Cheniere Energy’s Sabine Pass liquefaction terminal. About 1 billion cubic feet per day is set to be liquefied at Sabine Pass, not enough by itself to have a huge impact on pricing, but with some help from colder weather, prices could rise back above $3 per thousand cubic feet and stay there for a while.

[nativounit]

There is also the possibility that production increases will simply push costs down again even if the coming winter is colder than last winter and LNG production increases. U.S. supplies are expected to reach record highs by the end of this year’s injection season in October, further tamping down prices.

Chesapeake has said it expects to divest some $2 billion in assets during 2016 and that will surely help the company’s cash flow. The sale of the Barnett assets is expected to add $200 million to $300 million to operating income through 2019. Now if the company could only do something about revenues.

Shares traded down about 4.3% in the mid-afternoon Wednesday, at $5.66 in a 52-week range of $1.50 to $9.55. The 12-month price target on the shares is $5.25.

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618