New Shell CEO: Why the Company Picked a Downstream Guy

By Paul Ausick Updated Apr 28, 2:39AM EDT · Published Jul 9, 11:55AM EDT

Follow 24/7 Wall St. on Google

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

When supermajor oil companies like Royal Dutch Shell PLC (NYSE: RDS-A) pick a new chief executive officer, the new appointment virtually always comes from the upstream exploration and production side of the business. After all, the valuation of these companies is based largely on the amount of reserves they have in the ground and how successful they are at getting those reserves produced and then replaced.

Downstream, which comprises refining and marketing, has been of diminishing interest to the supermajors, and many have shed refining operations or spun them off as separate businesses. ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) spun out Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX) and Marathon Oil Corp. (NYSE: MRO) has spun off Marathon Petroleum Corp. (NYSE: MPC), for example.

In Europe, refining finds itself in even more dire straits. Plants are being sold or closed all over the continent. Refinery margins traditionally have been volatile based on the price of crude. When crude prices are high, refining margins slip; when crude is cheaper, margins rise.

In the United States, the differential between the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent has offered refiners some magnificent margins in the past few years, but as the two prices converge (the differential is less than $5 a barrel today, compared with an all-time high a couple of years ago of around $27 a barrel) margins should tighten again.

But they are not. In its most recent quarter, Shell reported earnings from refining that were 56% higher sequentially. Production earnings rose by just half that amount. And Shell apparently believes that Ben van Beurden, who will take over as CEO next April, has the background to continue reaping the rewards available in the downstream businesses as well as the upstream operations.

Shell has closed or sold refineries in the United States and Europe. The company’s plans do not include large expenditures on downstream, primarily because it has reached a point where its portfolio of refineries and chemicals plants is long-term profit engine. Van Beurden gets the credit for that, and Shell’s board undoubtedly hopes that he can similarly rationalize the firm’s exploration and production operations, particularly in the massively expensive deepwater and integrated gas businesses.

Shell’s goals include maintaining the profits from refining and chemicals, as well as boosting profits from the company’s huge investments in natural gas and oil. We’re about to find out if a guy from the downstream side of the business has the chops to make it happen.

About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.