Why $70 Billion for BG Is Cheap

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Shell sign at dusk
Wikimedia Commons
Oil supermajor Royal Dutch Shell PLC (NYSE: RDS-B) announced Wednesday morning that it has agreed to acquire Britain’s BG Group in a cash and stock deal worth nearly $70 billion. The price represents a premium of about 52% to BG’s 90-day volume weighted average price, as of April 7, 2015.

BG is the world’s largest independent liquefied natural gas (LNG) producer and claims natural gas reserves totaling about 6.3 trillion cubic feet. Much of the company’s reserves and expertise are in deepwater and in natural gas liquefaction and transportation. Shell becomes the world’s largest producer of LNG with this deal.

What Shell has done is make an acquisition that will do more than move the needle a tick or two on its future revenues and profits. The last really big deal of this kind was Exxon Mobil Corp.’s (NYSE: XOM) $40 billion acquisition of natural gas producer XTO Energy in 2009. That deal made Exxon the largest natural gas producer in the United States.

Supermajor oil companies like Shell and Exxon need big deals like this one to make an appreciable difference in their growth. That is one reason such acquisitions are rare in the energy — there are not many buyers and not many targets.

Wednesday’s acquisition boosts Shell’s proved oil and gas reserves by 25% and adds new massive LNG and oil projects in waters offshore of Australia and Brazil. That is an additional 3.25 billion barrels of oil equivalent on top of Shell’s approximately 13 billion barrels of reserves at the end of 2014. This is no small beer.

Another way to look at it is that Shell is paying about $21.50 per barrel of oil equivalent. And that is per barrel of proved reserves, not possible or probable reserves.

While natural gas sells for less than $3 per thousand cubic feet in the United States, buyers in Asia often pay five to six times that, and each barrel of oil equivalent is equal to around 6,000 cubic feet. So figure $15 per thousand cubic feet times six — that is $90 per barrel of oil equivalent. Of course there are the liquefaction costs, but any way we look at, Shell is getting a good deal.

Shell is paying BG shareholders 383 pence (about $5.73) and 0.4454 Shell B shares per share of BG stock. That amounts to about 1,367 pence (about $20.44) a share. Once the transaction is completed, current BG shareholders will own approximately 19% of Shell.

Shell’s B shares traded down about 5.8% early Wednesday morning, at $61.68 in a 52-week range of $59.33 to $88.13.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618