BHP Billiton to Sell Assets It Never Should Have Purchased

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
BHP Billiton to Sell Assets It Never Should Have Purchased

© Thinkstock

In 2011, mining giant BHP Billiton Ltd. (NYSE: BHP) coughed up $20 billion to acquire onshore U.S. energy assets primarily in the Haynesville and Eagle Ford shale plays. Elliott Management and chief Paul Singer say that BHP has destroyed about $40 billion in the company’s value as a result of bad strategy and mismanagement.

The company reported quarterly results late Monday and, among other things, said that it had determined that its U.S. shale operations were not core to its business and that it was actively looking at options to leave the business. Like oil and gas development, the company’s iron ore, copper and other mining operations require big capital expenditures, and that has been a big drag on profits and dividends.

At the same time that it announced that it is looking to sell its shale assets, BHP boosted in its final 2017 dividend by a factor of three, from $0.14 per share annually to $0.43, for the fourth quarter. On an annual basis the full-year dividend payout will total $0.83 per share.

[nativounit]

In 2011, BHP paid $15 billion to acquire Petrohawk Energy and $4.75 billion to acquire nearly 500,000 leased acres in the Fayetteville shale play from Chesapeake Energy Corp. (NYSE: CHK). The price premium BHP paid for Petrohawk was about 60%. In 2015, BHP took an after-tax charge of $2 billion related to its natural gas assets in the Hawkville field of the Eagle Ford shale play.

Macquarie Wealth Management analyst Martin Lakos told Bloomberg TV that he thinks that BHP’s shale assets are worth about $8 billion to $10 billion, and he emphasized that the planned divestment is not a fire sale.

In hindsight, BHP overpaid for Petrohawk, and the 2015 write-down cut the value of the assets even further. In our view, Macquarie’s estimate is the upper end of what BHP can expect, and that’s only true as long as the market for the company’s other minerals remains strong. Once commodity prices fall again, what the shale assets will be worth to BHP is whatever a buyer is willing to pay.

BHP stock traded up about 1.5% in the noon hour on Tuesday, at $41.50 in a 52-week range of $29.30 to $42.00. The 12-month consensus price target is $36.97.

[recirclink id=409426]

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618