Can Trump Administration Deliver the Coal and Boost FirstEnergy?

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Can Trump Administration Deliver the Coal and Boost FirstEnergy?

© Thinkstock

The Trump administration, particularly Energy Secretary Rick Perry, suffered a major setback last month when the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) rejected Perry’s proposal to pay coal plant operators for their “resilience,” that is, their ability to generate electricity to meet unforeseen demands.

Now some administration officials are proposing that Perry use his authority under Section 202 of the Federal Power Act to order certain plants to remain online if he determines that the plant is needed to “serve the public interest” in an emergency. Among the potential beneficiaries of such an order would be FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE: FE), which is currently moving to rid itself of its unprofitable merchant power business and become a fully regulated utility.

A U.S. Department of Energy spokeswoman, when asked by Bloomberg News to confirm the talks, said “that is not correct information.” One of Bloomberg’s sources noted that FirstEnergy has not formally requested that Perry issue such an order.

Last month FirstEnergy lost a FERC case when the agency refused to accept the company’s plan to transfer its Pleasants merchant power plant in West Virginia to the company’s regulated business. The West Virginia public services commission accepted the plan that would have kept the Pleasants plant open as a regulated utility but placed conditions on the transfer that would have forced FirstEnergy to accept some of the financial risk.

[nativounit]

On Monday, FirstEnergy said it would not request a rehearing of the FERC decision and that it would not accept the conditions of the West Virginia commission’s order that would result in the company “assuming exposure and significant commodity risk, which is inconsistent with FirstEnergy’s announced corporate strategy.”

Had the Pleasants plant — which has a nameplate capacity of 1,300 megawatts — been sold to FirstEnergy’s regulated business, the plant would have been guaranteed a rate of return of around 10%. If Secretary Perry puts his thumb on the scale, then FirstEnergy gets what it wanted and customers get stuck with the bill, just like the company planned all along.

Activist investor Paul Singer and Elliott Management together with two other firms made an equity investment of $2.5 billion on FirstEnergy in late January that the company will use to reduce debt and make a contribution to its pension plan.

FirstEnergy stock traded up about 0.8% just after Friday’s opening bell, at $30.87 in a 52-week range of $27.93 to $35.22. The 12-month consensus price target on the stock is $36.25.

[recirclink id=442399]

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618