Democratic Plan to Dodge the Sequester Includes Tax Hike for Millionaires

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

West side view of the United States Capitol building.
Thinkstock
Early this afternoon Senate Democrats revealed their plan to replace the $85 billion cut to federal spending known as the sequester with a $110 billion package that raises $54 billion in new revenue and cuts about $55 billion in federal spending. Republican House Speaker John Boehner had said this morning that he would wait for the Senate to pass a budget bill before bringing a bill up in the House.

That’s not to say that the Democratic bill is going to make it out of the Senate. Republicans in both houses of Congress are opposed to an tax increase to replace spending cuts.

The $54 billion tax increase proposed by the Democrats would come from an implementation of the so-called Buffett Rule, which would set a minimum tax rate for wealthy taxpayers, a change in the tax treatment of oil recovered from oil sands deposits, and an end to tax breaks that encourage companies to move jobs overseas.

Details are scarce, but according to thehill.com, implementing a Buffett Rule would mean phasing in a 30% effective tax rate for incomes between $1 and $2 million. A good example of how this might work is provided Tony Nitti over at Forbes.com.

Last year the Joint Committee on Taxation estimated that a 30% tax rate would generate about $5 billion a year, a nice chunk, but still less than 10% of the $54 billion in tax increases required under the Democrats’ proposal. The other loopholes would not make up the difference, so there are definitely boxes still to be filled in.

While there are still some questions about how it all might work and how much money it might raise, it’s pretty certain that none of that matters. The Republicans are a virtual lock to kill the bill, perhaps even in the Senate.

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618