Building a portfolio around companies with durable competitive advantages sounds obvious until you try to identify which moats will actually hold. VanEck’s MOAT ETF solves this by outsourcing that decision to Morningstar’s equity research team, which screens thousands of companies for pricing power, switching costs, network effects, and other structural defenses.
What MOAT Does Well
MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, holding around 50 US companies that Morningstar’s analysts believe possess sustainable competitive advantages and trade below fair value. The fund rebalances quarterly, keeping turnover moderate at 55%. At $12.9 billion in assets, it offers tight spreads and reliable liquidity.
The portfolio leans heavily into Industrials (23.9%), Information Technology (21.9%), and Healthcare (18.8%), with zero exposure to Energy, Materials, or Utilities. Top holdings include Huntington Ingalls Industries, UPS, Estée Lauder, and Airbnb. The largest position represents just under 3% of the fund.
Over the past decade, MOAT returned 340%, compared to 261% for the S&P 500. That’s meaningful outperformance, though the gap narrows over shorter periods. In the past year, MOAT gained 16.8% versus 16.9% for SPY. Over five years, MOAT returned 77% against SPY’s 83%. The fund’s industrial tilt has helped recently, with the Industrials sector ETF (XLI) up 25% over the past year, but that same concentration introduces cyclical risk.
The Tradeoffs
MOAT charges 0.47%, reasonable for an actively selected strategy but still 42 basis points more than a total market fund like VTI. That fee matters over time, especially when moat stocks underperform.
The fund’s sector concentration is double-edged. Nearly two-thirds of assets sit in Industrials, Tech, and Healthcare. When those sectors lead, MOAT benefits. When they lag, the portfolio has limited diversification to cushion losses. The complete absence of Energy and Materials means MOAT offers no direct commodity exposure, which could be problematic during inflation-driven rotations.
Finally, Morningstar’s moat ratings are subjective. Analysts can be wrong about competitive durability, and quarterly rebalancing means you’re trusting their ongoing judgment calls.
Who Should Skip MOAT
Investors seeking broad diversification across all sectors should look elsewhere. MOAT’s concentrated bets make it unsuitable as a standalone core holding. Cost-conscious investors building long-term wealth through index strategies will find the 0.47% expense ratio hard to justify when VTI charges just 0.03% and has outperformed over five years.
Consider VTI Instead
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) offers complete US equity market exposure at 0.03%, with comparable one-year returns (16.5%) and better five-year performance (72.8% vs. 77% for MOAT). VTI’s 3,500+ holdings eliminate single-sector concentration risk, making it a simpler, cheaper core holding for investors who want market returns without active selection risk.
MOAT works best as a satellite position for investors who believe quality stocks with pricing power will outperform over time and are willing to accept sector concentration and higher fees for that thesis. The long-term outperformance is real, but the recent narrowing suggests the moat premium isn’t guaranteed.
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks