AppLovin (NASDAQ:APP | APP Price Prediction) shares have tumbled 15% over the past three trading sessions after investment and research firm CapitalWatch released a report yesterday accusing the company of enabling money laundering through ties to Asian criminal networks.
The report alleges that major shareholders used AppLovin’s advertising tools to clean billions in illicit funds from China and Southeast Asia. AppLovin has not issued a response yet to the claims, but the stock is falling another 8% in premarket trading this morning, reaching around $528 per share.
This latest allegation follows prior short-seller attacks and an SEC probe opened last October into AppLovin’s data practices. With the stock up 69% over the past year, should investors sell now or wait for more clarity?
Unpacking CapitalWatch’s Core Claims
The CapitalWatch report, titled “The Southeast Asian Money Laundering Syndicate’s NASDAQ ‘Laundromat’,” focuses on AppLovin’s capital structure and operations. It accuses primary shareholder Hao Tang and his network of injecting illegal funds into the company while evading anti-money laundering rules. The document links these funds to about 6.67 billion yuan in illegal proceeds from China’s Tuandaiwang platform, a collapsed peer-to-peer lending site, and revenues from Southeast Asian scams like “pig-butchering” crypto frauds.
CapitalWatch describes a “Mobius Loop” system where criminal groups pay AppLovin for ads via intermediaries, converting dirty money into legitimate revenue. This involves the company’s AXON algorithm and Array software, with payments routed through apps like Cambodia’s WOWNOW. The report also claims Hao Tang partnered with Chen Zhi, leader of Cambodia’s Prince Group, which the U.S. Justice Dept. has tied to telecom fraud and human trafficking.
Additionally, CapitalWatch alleges AppLovin’s algorithms help distribute gambling and scam apps by targeting vulnerable users. It points to a hidden team of over 15 staff in mainland China handling U.S. user data, despite its CEO’s statements downplaying China operations, potentially inviting scrutiny from regulators like CFIUS. These claims build on AppLovin’s history of facing compliance questions that have now amplified the market’s concerns.
Echoes from Past Short-Seller Attacks
AppLovin has drawn fire from other research firms over the years, often questioning its data handling and growth tactics. Fuzzy Panda Research issued a report in February, 2025, claiming the company’s AI-driven success stemmed from ad fraud. It alleged AppLovin stole data from Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META) to refine targeting, tracked children illegally, and served inappropriate sex ads to minors. The firm also highlighted potential violations in serving ads, contributing to a 12% stock drop that day.
Culper Research has targeted AppLovin multiple times. Also in February 2025, it accused the company of forcing silent app installs on users’ devices without consent, dubbing it a “backdoor” tactic that inflated metrics. A subsequent report in June went further, alleging undisclosed ties to Chinese ad-tech firms for cross-border expansion, contradicting executive denials of significant China involvement. Culper raised national security flags over Hao Tang’s ongoing stake — estimated at least 9.8% through offshore entities — that led to a 4% stock decline.
Muddy Waters Research joined the fray last March, shorting AppLovin and estimating 52% of its e-commerce conversions came from retargeting users, with low incrementality of 25% to 35%. The report claimed code analysis showed AppLovin collected user IDs from partners like Meta, Snap (NYSE:SNAP), and Google parent Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG)(NASDAQ:GOOGL), violating terms of service to build identity graphs for ad optimization. Shares fell 20% after the report’s release. These reports prompted the SEC to open an investigation in October into whether AppLovin breached partner agreements on data use for targeted ads.
Key Takeaways
Short-seller reports like these come from firms positioned to profit from stock declines, so their findings aren’t automatically factual and often face pushback from targeted companies. However, CapitalWatch’s allegations of money laundering and criminal ties are severe, potentially exposing the firm to lawsuits if unfounded.
While investors might prefer waiting for AppLovin’s official rebuttal before deciding, given the gravity of the allegations — ties to fraud networks and possible DOJ involvement — selling could be the better option. With shares up almost 70% from a year ago, locking in gains and monitoring developments may prove wiser than holding through escalating scrutiny.