IWM vs. IJR: Two Small Cap ETFs That Own Very Different Companies. Here Is Which One to Buy.

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published

Quick Read

  • The iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) differ fundamentally in construction: IJR requires demonstrated earnings while IWM includes ~40% unprofitable companies, and IJR charges 0.06% versus IWM’s 0.19% expense ratio, creating a compounding cost advantage of $130 annually per $10,000 invested.

  • Small-cap stocks are outperforming large-cap indexes in 2026 due to lower valuations and operational leverage, with IJR up 4.53% year-to-date and IWM up 2.26%, positioning both funds to benefit from a potential rotation toward smaller companies with domestic revenue focus.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
IWM vs. IJR: Two Small Cap ETFs That Own Very Different Companies. Here Is Which One to Buy.

© bangoland / Shutterstock.com

Small caps are having a better 2026 than most investors expected. While large-cap indexes have struggled under the weight of mega-cap volatility, smaller comapnies with more domestic revenue have quietly held up better. The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSE: IWM | IWM Price Prediction) is up 2.26% year-to-date as of April 2, while the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (NYSE:IJR) has gained 4.53% over the same period.

The good news is that both are beating the broader market by a meaningful margin, which has brought renewed attention to a comparison most investors have never thought through carefully. The two funds look similar on the surface, as both hold small-cap US stocks and both come from iShares.

The similarities continue when you consider that both have billions in assets and decades of history, but the way they select companies is fundamentally different, and the difference shows up in the returns, the risk profile, and the long-term performance trajectory. Knowing which one you own and why matters more than most people realize.

The Numbers Side-by-Side

IJR IWM
Year-to-Date Return 2.26% 4.53%
1-Year Return 25.33% 19.56%
3-Year Return 13.45% 10.83%
Expense Ratio 0.19% 0.06%

The 1-year return favors the iShares Russell ETF according to April 2, 2026, numbers from Yahoo Finance, but the YTD and cost story favors the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF, and understanding why requires looking at what each fund actually owns.

The Index Methodology Is Where Everything Diverges

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF tracks the Russell 2000 index, which comprises the 2,000 smallest companies after the largest 1,000 have been excluded. There is no profitability requirement, and a company that has never earned a dollar of profit can sit inside this fund indefinitely as long as it meets the size criteria. Roughly 40% of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF’s holdings are currently unprofitable. Currently, healthcare leads the sector mix at 17.56%, followed by industrials at 16.84%, financial services at 15.65%, and technology at 15.16%

The iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF tracks the S&P SmallCap 600, which requires demonstrated earnings before a company can be included. This single filter changes the character of the fund entirely, as you are not just getting smaller companies, you are getting smaller companies that are actually making money. Financial services lead the way at 16.56%, industrials at 16.19%, consumer cyclical at 14.57%, and technology at 14.42%. The top ten holdings represent just 6.71% of total assets, reflecting how broadly distributed the exposure is across quality-screened names.

The cost difference compounds that quality advantage over time, and at 0.06%, the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF costs roughly one-third of what the iShares Russell 2000 ETF charges at 0.19%. On a $10,000 investment, that is $130 per year in additional fees for the iShares Russell 2000 ETF, every year, regardless of performance.

The Valuation Picture

Small caps trade at a meaningful discount to large caps on a price-to-earnings basis, a gap near historic highs. The iShares Russell 2000 ETF has a PE ratio of 18.36, while the iShares Core S&P ETF has a PE ratio of 17.71, both considerably lower than the S&P 500.

When economic growth broadens beyond mega-cap companies, smaller businesses with operational leverage tend to benefit the most. Both funds are positioned to capture that rotation. The iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF just does it with a higher-quality underlying portfolio.

Which One Should You Own

For long-term buy-and-hold investors, the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF is the stronger core holding. The profitability screen removes the drag of unprofitable companies, which weigh on returns over full market cycles. The lower expense ratio compounds that advantage every year. And the historical record of better risk-adjusted returns over long periods makes the quality tilt worth paying attention to.

The iShares Russell 2000 ETF serves a different purpose as it is the benchmark that institutional investors, options traders, and financial media reference when discussing small-cap performance. If you need to track that benchmark precisely, hedge against it, or trade options tied to it, the iShares Russell 2000 ETF is the right tool. The liquidity and depth of its options market are unmatched in the small-cap space.

The bottom line is to know which job you need the funds for. If the answer is long-term compounding with small-cap exposure, the iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF is the better answer.

 

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618