Is Las Vegas Sands Big Macao Push Going to Hurt?

Photo of Rich Duprey
By Rich Duprey Published

Quick Read

  • Las Vegas Sands (LVS) posted Q4 2025 revenue of $3.649B, beating estimates 9.88%, but Macao EBITDA fell short at $608M with a 28.9% margin, 390 basis points below prior year.

  • Management targets $700M quarterly Macao EBITDA but faces margin pressure from higher promotional spending and wage inflation hitting in March.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Is Las Vegas Sands Big Macao Push Going to Hurt?

© Sean Pavone / Getty Images

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS | LVS Price Prediction) reports Q1 2026 results today after the close, with a conference call at 1:30 p.m. PT. The stock is up 8.71% over the past month but down 11.14% year to date, and a Macao margin story will be front and center.

A Strong Finish, a Complicated Setup

Las Vegas Sands closed 2025 on a high note. Q4 2025 revenue came in at $3.649 billion, beating estimates by 9.88%, with adjusted EPS of $0.85 topping the $0.77 consensus by 10.39%. Marina Bay Sands in Singapore was the headline act, posting $806 million in EBITDA at a 50.3% margin, driven by rolling chip volume that nearly doubled year over year to $13.4 billion. CEO Rob Goldstein called it “simply the greatest quarter in the history of casino hotels.”

Macao told a different story. Macao delivered $608 million of EBITDA for the quarter, and management said it was disappointed with that number. The Macao EBITDA margin came in at 28.9%, down 390 basis points versus Q4 2024, pressured by higher promotional spending, a heavier mix of rolling (VIP) play, and elevated event costs. Management set a target of $700 million per quarter in Macao EBITDA and framed the current margin range as a “low 30s margin business” given the current customer mix. That gap between where Macao is and where management wants it to be is the tension heading into today’s print.

The year-ago quarter also sets up a favorable comparison. Q1 2025 revenue fell 3.28% year over year to $2.862 billion, missing estimates slightly, while Macao revenue dropped 5.6% as the Venetian Macao’s rolling chip win rate collapsed to 2.18% from 6.71% a year prior.

Consensus Estimates: Q1 2026

Metric Q1 2026 Estimate Q1 2025 Actual YoY Growth
Adjusted EPS $0.76 $0.59 +28.8%
Revenue $3.31B $2.862B +15.6%
Full Year EPS $3.24 (17x forward P/E) $3.01 N/A
Full Year Revenue N/A $13.017B N/A

Macao Margins and the Premium Mass Bet

This is the core question for today’s report. Las Vegas Sands has doubled down on the premium mass and rolling segments in Macao, and that strategic shift carries a real margin cost. Rolling play generates lower hold-adjusted margins than base mass gaming. Grant Chum, CEO of Sands China, noted that rolling volumes were up 60% year over year in Q4 but that the promotional environment “remains intense,” particularly in premium segments. He also flagged that base mass spend per customer “has been on a declining trend versus pre-COVID” and that base mass gaming growth “is just not growing as fast as the premium segments.”

The Londoner Macao is the bright spot. Revenue at the Londoner grew from $518 million to $699 million year over year in Q4, and management credited the Londoner Grand suite ramp as a key driver of higher-end adoption. The key question is whether that momentum carried into Q1 2026, and whether the Venetian Macao can show a cleaner win rate after the low-hold quarter that crushed Q1 2025 results.

Wage inflation is also a factor. Chum noted that “wage adjustments occur in March” for frontline staff, meaning Q1 will absorb that cost hit directly. That timing, combined with the ongoing promotional intensity in Macao’s premium segment, creates real margin pressure even if revenue grows as expected.

On Singapore, the question is sustainability. Goldstein said he sees “$2.9 billion of EBITDA” from MBS annually, but Q4’s exceptional rolling chip win rate of 4.36% versus a normalized 3.34% inflated results. A reversion to normal hold rates would pull Singapore EBITDA meaningfully lower. Jefferies downgraded LVS to Hold on April 20, citing a “less compelling earnings profile” and expected Macau GGR growth deceleration. That’s a cautious signal heading into today’s call.

The Margin Story Is What Matters Now

The year-ago comparison is easy. Q1 2025 operating income fell 17.03% year over year, and a normalized win rate in Macao alone should produce a better headline. But the real test is whether management can show credible progress toward that $700 million quarterly Macao EBITDA target without relying on luck-driven rolling chip results. If Macao margins show sequential improvement and Singapore holds at a normalized level, sentiment can shift quickly. Analysts carry a consensus Buy rating with an average price target of $69.30 against a current price of $57.54. That gap closes faster if the margin story starts to work.

Photo of Rich Duprey
About the Author Rich Duprey →

After two decades of patrolling the dark corners of suburbia as a police officer, Rich Duprey hung up his badge and gun to begin writing full time about stocks and investing. For the past 20 years he’s been cruising the markets looking for companies to lock up as long-term holdings in a portfolio while writing extensively on the broad sectors of consumer goods, technology, and industrials. Because his experience isn’t from the typical financial analyst track, Rich is able to break down complex topics into understandable and useful action points for the average investor. His writings have appeared on The Motley Fool, InvestorPlace, Yahoo! Finance, and Money Morning. He has been interviewed for both U.S. and international publications, including MarketWatch, Financial Times, Forbes, Fast Company, and USA Today.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618