Andrew Sather: Why Some Stock Buybacks Are Basically “Putting Money on Fire”

Photo of Omor Ibne Ehsan
By Omor Ibne Ehsan Published

Quick Read

  • ADMA Biologics (ADMA) CEO Adam Grossman emphasized organically funded share repurchases as part of a disciplined capital deployment strategy supported by a strong balance sheet. Buybacks create value when funded from free cash flow and executed at reasonable valuations, but destroy shareholder capital when companies repurchase shares at extreme P/E multiples or use debt to finance them.

  • Stock buyback effectiveness hinges on execution: repurchasing at sensible valuations with genuine free cash flow preserves long-term returns, while buybacks at inflated multiples or funded through debt amounts to financial engineering that wastes capital.

     

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Andrew Sather: Why Some Stock Buybacks Are Basically “Putting Money on Fire”

© OMG_Studio / Shutterstock.com

Stock buybacks have become one of the most misunderstood tools in corporate finance. On a recent episode of The Investing for Beginners Podcast, co-hosts Andrew Sather and Stephen Morris broke down when share repurchases reward long-term holders and when they amount to financial engineering that destroys value. The takeaway for retail investors: execution is everything.

The Pizza Slice Analogy

Sather framed the basic mechanic in plain terms. “Each of us has a slice. That slice of the pie can represent your share of stock. And when a company does buybacks, your share is getting bigger even though the size of the company is staying the same.” Fewer shares outstanding means each remaining share owns a larger claim on earnings, cash flow, and assets. That is the bull case in one sentence.

When Buybacks Become “Money on Fire”

The mechanic only works when management buys shares at sensible prices. Sather’s sharpest critique targets companies that repurchase stock at extreme valuations: “When your price-to-earnings is 100 or something, the amount of shares they’re able to buy back is so small that it’s like you’re kind of just putting money on fire and billions and billions of dollars are going to increase my ownership stake by 0.01.”

At a P/E of 100, every dollar spent retires a tiny number of shares. The accretion to ownership is negligible, and the cash is gone.

Three Red Flags to Watch

  • Debt-funded repurchases. Morris compared borrowing to retire shares with “using a credit card to pay off another credit card.” The balance sheet weakens while EPS gets a cosmetic lift.
  • Buybacks at the expense of growth. When repurchases crowd out R&D, capital expenditures, or expansion that the business actually needs, holders trade long-term compounding for short-term optics.
  • Buybacks at inflated valuations. The “money on fire” problem. Cash leaves the company, and the ownership bump is a rounding error.

What a Healthy Buyback Looks Like

A sustainable program is funded from genuine free cash flow, executed when shares trade at reasonable multiples, and paired with (rather than replacing) a dividend. Listen for management language that ties buybacks to operating cash generation. ADMA Biologics (NASDAQ:ADMA) CEO Adam Grossman, for example, recently described “organically funded share repurchases” as part of a disciplined capital deployment strategy supported by a strong balance sheet. That framing matters more than the headline authorization size.

A Retail Investor’s Checklist

Before celebrating any buyback announcement, ask four questions:

  1. Is the program funded from free cash flow or from new borrowings?
  2. At what earnings multiple are shares being repurchased?
  3. Is the company still investing in organic growth and acquisitions?
  4. Does the buyback complement a dividend, or substitute for one?

Buybacks are a tool. The same instrument that compounds returns for patient holders can also incinerate shareholder capital when wielded carelessly. The job of the retail investor is to tell the difference.

 

Photo of Omor Ibne Ehsan
About the Author Omor Ibne Ehsan →

Omor Ibne Ehsan is a writer at 24/7 Wall St. He is a self-taught investor with a focus on growth and cyclical stocks that have strong fundamentals, value, and long-term potential. He also has an interest in high-risk, high-reward investments such as cryptocurrencies and penny stocks.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

MU Vol: 16,693,253
COIN Vol: 2,694,766
EBAY Vol: 7,943,976
CEG Vol: 462,519
VST Vol: 993,630

Top Losing Stocks

NCLH Vol: 20,092,682
UPS Vol: 4,262,076
CHRW Vol: 536,317
FDX Vol: 1,038,284