Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF Delivers 67% Five-Year Returns Against Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF’s Steadier 229% Decade Gain

Photo of Austin Smith
By Austin Smith Published

Quick Read

  • Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) uses a quality-weighted screen requiring 10-year dividend history and strong cash flow, concentrating 12.5% in Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and ConocoPhillips, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) tracks 400-500 dividend payers with no quality gates, tilting toward financials and industrials. SCHD returned 229.46% over 10 years versus VYM’s 204.10%, but VYM gained 67.14% over five years compared to SCHD’s 46.06%, reflecting VYM’s advantage in recent market conditions.

  • SCHD’s healthcare-heavy portfolio faces drug pricing pressure risks while VYM benefits from broader exposure, making SCHD the better choice for retirees seeking predictable dividend raises and VYM the practical pick for investors wanting yield without concentration risk.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF Delivers 67% Five-Year Returns Against Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF’s Steadier 229% Decade Gain

© jittawit21 / Shutterstock.com

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEARCA: SCHD | SCHD Price Prediction) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (NYSEARCA: VYM) sit on most income investors’ shortlists. Both entered 2026 with fresh distributions and updated holdings. The two funds chase dividends through very different rule sets, and the gap between them is wider than the surface suggests.

Quality Screen vs. Yield Net: How Each Fund Builds Its Book

SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, a quality-weighted screen that demands cash flow strength, return on equity, and a 10-year dividend record. The result is concentrated. Bristol-Myers Squibb sits at 4.26% of the fund, followed by Merck at 4.14% and ConocoPhillips at 4.10%. Healthcare names BMY, MRK, and ABBV anchor three of the top 10 slots, with energy and consumer staples doing most of the rest.

VYM casts a wider net. The fund tracks the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which sweeps in roughly 400 to 500 above-average yielders without strict quality gates. That breadth softens single-stock risk and tilts the portfolio toward financials and industrials that SCHD’s screen often filters out.

Lens SCHD VYM
Expense Ratio 0.06% 0.04%
Net Assets $71.6 billion Not disclosed
Index Style Quality + yield screen Broad yield basket
Top Sector Tilt Healthcare, Energy, Staples Financials, Industrials, Healthcare

The Distribution Trail Tells Two Stories

SCHD pays steady but smaller per-share checks. The March 2026 distribution came in at $0.2569, following $0.2782 in December 2025. VYM’s payouts run far larger per share. VYM’s March 2026 dividend was $0.8617, with the December 2025 payment at $0.9474. The dollar gap reflects share price, not yield. SCHD closed May 7, 2026, at $31.54, while VYM finished at $155.16.

Why the Returns Have Diverged

Performance has split sharply. VYM has returned 67.14% over five years, well ahead of SCHD’s 46.06%. Year to date: SCHD up 15.95% versus VYM up 8.7%. Over a decade, the leader flips: SCHD’s 229.46% beats VYM’s 204.10%. The quality screen wins long; the wider basket has won lately.

What I Am Watching Through Year End

I want to see whether SCHD’s healthcare-heavy book holds up if drug pricing pressure returns, and whether VYM’s financial weighting can keep adding to gains if the rate curve flattens. SCHD’s 2024 distributions were unusually large ($0.611 to $0.8241 per quarter), and 2025 looked like a reset, so the next four payouts will tell us what the new run rate is.

Why I Lean SCHD for Income, VYM for Total Return

For me, the choice depends on the job. If I want a focused, quality-screened dividend stream and I am comfortable with healthcare and energy concentration, SCHD reads cleaner. If I want broader exposure, slightly lower fees, and bigger recent capital gains, VYM is the practical pick. Retirees prioritizing predictable raises may favor SCHD. Investors who want yield without giving up market breadth will sleep better in VYM. I would not own both at full size. They overlap enough that one slot in a portfolio is plenty.

Photo of Austin Smith
About the Author Austin Smith →

Austin Smith is a financial publisher with over two decades of experience in the markets. He spent over a decade at The Motley Fool as a senior editor for Fool.com, portfolio advisor for Millionacres, and launched new brands in the personal finance and real estate investing space.

His work has been featured on Fool.com, NPR, CNBC, USA Today, Yahoo Finance, MSN, AOL, Marketwatch, and many other publications. Today he writes for 24/7 Wall St and covers equities, REITs, and ETFs for readers. He is as an advisor to private companies, and co-hosts The AI Investor Podcast.

When not looking for investment opportunities, he can be found skiing, running, or playing soccer with his children. Learn more about me here.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

DDOG Vol: 25,962,525
FTNT Vol: 18,102,434
AXON Vol: 2,559,298
PAYC Vol: 2,186,304
VTRS Vol: 34,749,741

Top Losing Stocks

ZTS Vol: 29,978,530
TPR Vol: 6,457,407
CTRA Vol: 73,319,495
TER Vol: 4,997,644
JBL Vol: 1,753,290