I’m worth over $20 million but I still insist on renting almost every luxury in my life

Photo of David Beren
By David Beren Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
I’m worth over $20 million but I still insist on renting almost every luxury in my life

© Canva | upsidedowndog from Getty Images Signature and IMAGE SUPPLY CO

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

24/7 Key Points

When buying a home or a car, the prevailing theory is that ownership is a smarter investment than renting. The belief behind this is that it comes from a place where anytime you rent and pay a lot of money, you won’t have anything to show for it at some point. This differs from buying in that although a car may cost more, it’s yours to resell, use as a trade, etc. 

In other words, you should have something to show if you’re paying thousands per month for a home and car, especially when renting things with a luxury price tag. This is the topic currently being discussed in r/fatFIRE in this Redditor’s post, claiming they are saving at least $100,000 per year by renting luxuries despite having a net worth of over $20 million. 

What I love about this post is that it should be a wake-up call for those who want to live in the FIRE (financial independence, retire early) world. They should own and not rent. 

The Scenario 

In this Reddit post, the Redditor of an unknown age breaks down his mindset into four categories. The first is his home, which he rents due to the “low rental rate luxury properties command.” He believes he’s getting a deal since buying a $5 million home costs up to $150,000 in rent while buying would cost between $300,000 and $400,000. 

The same goes for a car. This Redditor believes he can drive a leased Ferrari for around $30,000 annually. His “research” indicates the depreciation curve would be too much of a hit should he buy. The third category heavily relies on credit card points to save on travel. He initially opened up credit cards that offer as much as 500,000 points, which can be converted for dining and travel. He believes he saves $30,000 annually on travel using credit card points. 

Lastly, his shopping habits further solidify a frugal mindset. Ultimately, his take is that he finds his clothes using second-hand luxury consignment shops. In total, he indicates his four-stage strategy saves him around $200,000 per year he can invest in the market. 

The Recommendation 

While I’m not a financial expert and can’t claim to be one on Reddit either, I have to question whether this individual qualifies as a member of the FIRE club at all. Another Redditor says in the thread that the poster has said in the past he has a 20-plus million dollar net worth, but it’s hard to say exactly how much he earns. 

His theory has many holes, regardless of what he makes. The primary one concerns buying a home, which many people do with the idea it will appreciate and, therefore, make money in the long run. For some reason, this Redditor is ignoring this reality. As someone with equity in his home, this is a dangerous omission of what is honest about home buying. I can’t get on board with recommending renting indefinitely over buying. 

On the other hand, I also like leasing cars because I, too, exchange cars every few years. Knowing that it’s often less expensive than financing a vehicle, I’m on board with this idea, but only because it’s well-researched that it’s cheaper than buying. 

Many people use credit card points for travel, and there is a large community behind it. I’m on board with using points and am attempting to convince my spouse that we should have a travel credit card. I recommend sticking with the credit card idea, as it works. 

Last but not least, I recommend the second-hand idea when buying clothes. Places like Goodwill or Plato’s Closet are well-known for being gold mines for expensive clothing at a discount. This is a smart move, though I question if he’s saving what he says he’s really saving. 

The Takeaway

Look, in my eyes, there is frugal and frugal to the point of foolishness. In this case, and many of the Redditor commenters in this thread agree with me, this person is of the latter. I’m not sure if this person qualifies as a FIRE club member. 

Saving $200,000 per year doesn’t give us much to go on in understanding true net worth, and we don’t know this Redditor’s age or how long it will take them to retire. Overall, based on what we know, this person needs to stop being so frugal while understanding they aren’t ready to join any FIRE club. 

Photo of David Beren
About the Author David Beren →

David Beren has been a Flywheel Publishing contributor since 2022. Writing for 24/7 Wall St. since 2023, David loves to write about topics of all shapes and sizes. As a technology expert, David focuses heavily on consumer electronics brands, automobiles, and general technology. He has previously written for LifeWire, formerly About.com. As a part-time freelance writer, David’s “day job” has been working on and leading social media for multiple Fortune 100 brands. David loves the flexibility of this field and its ability to reach customers exactly where they like to spend their time. Additionally, David previously published his own blog, TmoNews.com, which reached 3 million readers in its first year. In addition to freelance and social media work, David loves to spend time with his family and children and relive the glory days of video game consoles by playing any retro game console he can get his hands on.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618