Taxpayer Group Protests Walgreen Offshore Move

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

WAG-2
Courtesy of Walgreen
With more than 7,800 stores worldwide, Walgreen Co. (NYSE: WAG) was the sixth-largest U.S. retailer, based on 2013 sales of nearly $72 billion and profit of $2.5 billion. Virtually all those sales and profits came in the United States. But the company’s pending buyout of Switzerland-based Alliance Boots chain stands to make Walgreen both bigger and more international.

Not only that, some investors say that the acquisition of Boots is the perfect opportunity for Walgreen to relocate offshore. If the company does make that move, Walgreen’s earnings per share could increase by as much as 75% as a result of more favorable Swiss tax laws. Unsurprisingly, some of the company’s largest shareholders are urging Walgreen to re-domicile: Goldman Sachs, Jana Partners, Corvex and Och-Ziff met with the company’s management in April to try to persuade the firm to make the move.

Last week a U.S. group called Americans for Tax Fairness published a report noting that if Walgreen relocated to Switzerland the company could avoid $4 billion in U.S. taxes over a five-year period. The activist group notes, for example, that Walgreen gets 25% of its income from U.S. taxpayers through government programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

ALSO READ: Eight Companies That Owe Employees a Raise

The Obama administration has proposed new, stiffer rules for U.S. companies that would reduce the amount of income companies earn overseas that could be sheltered from U.S. taxation. The proposed change will almost certainly not make it through the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

Walgreen’s management had rejected the April plea from its big investors, but the pressure to move will increase once the Boots acquisition is completed. The company cites “perceived political risks” as its main reason for remaining in the United States. Translation: Walgreen’s management believes it will suffer significant blowback from U.S. consumers given the current climate regarding offshore holdings by U.S. companies.

Management’s analysis is almost certainly correct, but the question investors will ask is, “So what? Maximizing profit for your shareholders is your only consideration.”

If the company does relocate offshore, it will join plenty of pharmaceutical, technology and other firms that have formed subsidiaries overseas in order to avoid high U.S. corporate taxes. The betting here is that sometime after the Boots deal is completed, say six months to a year, Walgreen will make the move. The longer management holds out, the greater chance it faces a shareholder revolt that it almost certainly could not win.

ALSO READ: America’s Nine Most Damaged Brands

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618