Are Analysts Finally Cutting Whole Foods Price Targets Too Low?

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
By Jon C. Ogg Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Are Analysts Finally Cutting Whole Foods Price Targets Too Low?

© Thinkstock

Whole Foods Market Inc. (NASDAQ: WFM) just does not seem to be able to get it right on earnings. Its more modern store push is not yielding what the company would have wished for, and there are risks from its lower-priced concept coming ahead. Now it seems like every single earnings report comes with yet even further analyst price target cuts — even from the few analysts who have remained positive.

For the quarter, the organic and natural foods grocery chain reported diluted earnings per share of $0.16, and it posted revenues of $3.44 billion. That compared to the Thomson Reuters consensus estimates for adjusted EPS of $0.35 and $3.47 billion in revenues. A year ago, the company reported EPS of $0.35 on revenues of $3.26 billion.

Before just focusing on that earnings miss, there were items to consider here: the fourth-quarter results included a non-cash asset impairment charge of $46 million, or $0.08 off of EPS, and a restructuring charge of $34 million, or $0.06 off of EPS. Suddenly things do not seem so bad. Or are they?

For the full year, Whole Foods posted diluted EPS of $1.48 on revenues of $15.39 billion, compared with fiscal 2014 EPS of $1.56 on $14.19 billion in revenues. The consensus estimates called for adjusted EPS of $1.67 on revenues of $15.42 billion.

ALSO READ: 4 Stocks That Could Be Cut in Half by Year’s End

24/7 Wall St. has frequently reported that the investing public should not to consider Whole Foods as a grocery store chain. Quite simply, Whole Foods is a luxury retail chain, because it is no longer focused just on organic foods but it charges a large premium versus peers. Its food sales and consumer staples sales come at a premium, even if they take EBT cards, and all you have to do is look at the cars in the parking lot and you will see that the average Whole Foods shopper has a higher base income than most other grocery chains — the company’s effort to reach down with smaller formats and lower prices for its 365 private label products notwithstanding.

Being a luxury chain generally comes with a premium valuation. Just one problem — or two problems: what happens when luxury chains get their lunch eaten by competition that sells the exact same good for a much lower price, and when the luxury chain has disappointing sales? What is happening here on the analyst coverage side is that analysts keep getting burned by backing or defending Whole Foods. Some value investors finally may start looking closer here, although they better be very conservative when making their forward earnings expectations.

24/7 Wall St. has opted to avoid deep analyst coverage after the drop, but here are some of the cuts we have seen after Whole Foods’ earnings report:

  • Bank of America Merrill Lynch has a Neutral rating, but lowered its price objective to $31 from $38.
  • Canaccord Genuity has a Hold rating, but it lowered its price target to $32 from $38.
  • Jefferies has a Hold rating, but it lowered its target to $29 from $33.
  • JPMorgan lowered its price target to $30 from $38.
  • Oppenheimer has an Outperform rating, but it lowered its target to $36 from $40.
  • Pivotal Research has a Sell rating and lowered its target to $20.
  • RBC Capital Markets has an Outperform rating, but it lowered its target to $37 from $46.
  • Sterne Agee CRT has a Neutral rating, but it lowered its price target to $26 from $34.
  • SunTrust Robinson Humphrey has a Buy rating and lowered its price target to $38 from $40.
  • Telsey Advisory Group has a Market Perform rating, but it lowered its price target to $30 from $34.
  • Wedbush has a Neutral rating, but it lowered its target to $29 from $38.

ALSO READ: 10 Brands That Will Disappear in 2016

While this stock is falling even further out of favor, there may at least be one saving grace ahead in its valuation. If you have ever been able to buy Whole Foods shares at these valuations, it was only at about two extremes in the past. The Merrill Lynch report sees a continued uncertainty about Whole Foods’ same-store sales and margin outlook and remains concerned about the potential impacts of a new value-oriented store concept on its core business. Merrill Lynch, which is again cautious rather than aggressive, gave its share price valuation now versus forward earnings to derive future P/E ratios, as follows:

  • 2014 (actual) 19.7
  • 2015 (actual) 19.1
  • 2016 (est.) 18.1
  • 2017 (est.) 16.2
  • 2018 (est.) 14.6

Whole Foods shares were down 4% at $29.41 late Thursday morning, and the stock hit a new 52-week low of $28.73, versus a 52-week high of $57.57.

ALSO READ: Jefferies Has Very Compelling Value Stocks to Buy Now

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
About the Author Jon C. Ogg →

Jon Ogg has been a financial news analyst since 1997. Mr. Ogg set up one of the first audio squawk box services for traders called TTN, which he sold in 2003. He has previously worked as a licensed broker to some of the top U.S. and E.U. financial institutions, managed capital, and has raised private capital at the seed and venture stage. He has lived in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as New York and Chicago, and he now lives in Houston, Texas. Jon received a Bachelor of Business Administration in finance at University of Houston in 1992. a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618