Will UPS Avoid a $3.5 Billion Pension Charge?

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
By Jon C. Ogg Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Will UPS Avoid a $3.5 Billion Pension Charge?

© Thinkstock

United Parcel Service Inc. (NYSE: UPS) reported a gain to its first quarter profit of 10% and managed to beat expectations. The $1.13 billion in income translated to $1.27 per share. Its first quarter revenue of $14.42 billion was up from a year ago’s revenue of $13.98 billion.

UPS managed to see a gain in operating earnings from stronger domestic and international shipping services, but its supply chain-freight division acted as a drag against earnings after the “less than truckload” sales were lower. Basic freight rates were up roughly 2%, but UPS went on to note that its fuel surcharge revenue declined due to those lower gasoline prices.

The big news was actually not the earnings, and was not even the guidance. UPS disclosed that the package and parcel transportation giant could face a charge against future earnings of roughly $3.5 billion. That charge is around its pension.
[nativounit]

The $3.5 billion sum for a potential charge against earnings is based upon the range of $3.2 to $3.8 billion, and if taken it would occur at some point during this year. One thing that UPS said earlier is that the company was not lowering its prior guidance, but this could send it toward the lower end of that range.

UPS’ potential pension issue was said to be related to the Central States Fund for Teamsters. UPS withdrew from this back in 2007 and paid close to $6 billion back then. Now the Central States union has apparently petitioned the Treasury Department to cut benefit payments as it said it does not have ample investment income to pay 100% of its obligations on an ongoing basis.

UPS did indicate that the company will make supplemental payments to retirees if the cuts are ordered. UPS also said that it would still oppose such a decision as it believes it would not be complying within the laws. Also noted was that if such payments are made, it would constitute an ongoing liability.

All in all, the earnings report was considered a win versus estimates. Growth in e-commerce was a driver here, and the company all in all is comfortable with its growth in China. Still this $3.5 billion charge would not be welcome — UPS’ total 2015 operating income was $7.67 billion and its 2015 net income from operations was $4.84 billion.

UPS closed down 1.5% at $104.84 on Thursday, versus a 52-week range of $87.30 to $107.32. It has a market cap of $92 billion. The sum of $3.5 billion might not be catastrophic on the surface, but it is impossible to think that this is a bite that would not hurt.

Photo of Jon C. Ogg
About the Author Jon C. Ogg →

Jon Ogg has been a financial news analyst since 1997. Mr. Ogg set up one of the first audio squawk box services for traders called TTN, which he sold in 2003. He has previously worked as a licensed broker to some of the top U.S. and E.U. financial institutions, managed capital, and has raised private capital at the seed and venture stage. He has lived in Copenhagen, Denmark, as well as New York and Chicago, and he now lives in Houston, Texas. Jon received a Bachelor of Business Administration in finance at University of Houston in 1992. a673b.bigscoots-temp.com.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618