Will Starbucks CEO Narasimhan Be a Union Buster?

By Douglas A. McIntyre Published Sep 6, 7:30AM EDT

Follow 24/7 Wall St. on Google

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Will Starbucks CEO Narasimhan Be a Union Buster? — © HAO XING / Wikimedia Commons

The Starbucks Corp. (NASDAQ: SBUX | SBUX Price Prediction) board of directors has elected Laxman Narasimhan as the company’s chief executive officer. He replaces CEO Howard Schultz, who has made a mighty effort to stop Starbucks’ employees from unionizing. In fact, some Starbucks watchers think Schultz pushed out former CEO Kevin Johnson because he had been too easy on labor.

The Schultz approach has driven a wedge between Starbucks and some of its workforce. Narasimhan has to decide if that is the wisest choice to run a company in which its hourly workers are the face of the business. Making more moves to cripple that labor movement might save money. On the other hand, the friction could be counterproductive for years.

Narasimhan’s other concern is that Schultz is as close to a company founder as anyone else. As he leaves his job, his influence on the board will not disappear.

It is hard to calculate how much a unionized labor force would cost Starbucks. It recently raised base pay to $15. When the decision was announced, company management estimated the costs of recent improvements in compensation at “approximately $1 billion in incremental investments in annual wages and benefits over the last two years.”
[nativounit]
In its most recently reported quarter, Starbucks had $8.2 billion in revenue and net income of $913 million. Improving the compensation for its front-line employees is expensive, based on those earnings numbers.

The battle between union and labor goes back over 100 years in American business history. For the most part, employees have improved their compensation positions in that time. Management resistance has often been tremendous, and labor disputes can last for years at some companies.
[wallst_email_signup]
Narasimhan has to decide whether a long period of strife between hourly workers and the company is worth it. It is bad publicity for Starbucks. It causes employee churn, which is expensive. And the union movement may win the battle as well.
[recirclink id=1165701]
Narasimhan’s decision is not just about money. It is about how Starbucks will be viewed by the public and its workers.

About the Author Douglas A. McIntyre →

Douglas A. McIntyre is the co-founder, chief executive officer and editor in chief of 24/7 Wall St. and 24/7 Tempo. He has held these jobs since 2006.

McIntyre has written thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St. He is an expert on corporate finance, the automotive industry, media companies and international finance. He has edited articles on national demographics, sports, personal income and travel.

His work has been quoted or mentioned in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, NBC News, Time, The New Yorker, HuffPost USA Today, Business Insider, Yahoo, AOL, MarketWatch, The Atlantic, Bloomberg, New York Post, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, The Guardian and many other major publications. McIntyre has been a guest on CNBC, the BBC and television and radio stations across the country.

A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College, McIntyre also was president of The Harvard Advocate. Founded in 1866, the Advocate is the oldest college publication in the United States.

TheStreet.com, Comps.com and Edgar Online are some of the public companies for which McIntyre served on the board of directors. He was a Vicinity Corporation board member when the company was sold to Microsoft in 2002. He served on the audit committees of some of these companies.

McIntyre has been the CEO of FutureSource, a provider of trading terminals and news to commodities and futures traders. He was president of Switchboard, the online phone directory company. He served as chairman and CEO of On2 Technologies, the video compression company that provided video compression software for Adobe’s Flash. Google bought On2 in 2009.