Is This Really a Solution to Rail Tank Car Explosions?

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Updated Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Railroad Oil Tank Cars
Thinkstock
The railroad industry is patting itself on the back for agreeing to a number of steps that it says will make a “safe rail network even safer.” The U.S. Department of Transportation, the Federal Railroad Administration, and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration were included in the discussions that led to the adoption of the voluntary steps that the U.S. railroads will take to make transportation of crude oil safer.

The agreed practices include:

  • Increased track inspections
  • Improved braking systems on trains
  • Adopt new rail traffic routing technology
  • Reduced speeds
  • Additional community relations
  • Better trackside safety technologies
  • Better training for local emergency responders
  • Create an inventory of emergency response resources

The industry itself has identified 27 risk factors associated with transporting hazardous materials, but the 8 steps the industry plans to take in no way address all of them.

For example, the steps do not retire the old tanker cars, known as DOT-111s. These are known to be more likely to break apart in a crash. Instead, the industry will now “operate trains with 20 or more tank cars carrying crude oil that include at least one older DOT-111 car no faster than 40 miles-per-hour in the federally designated 46 high-threat-urban areas (HTUA) as established by DHS regulations.” Those 46 routes are not publicly disclosed.

On the plus side, any steps the industry takes to self-regulate can be implemented much more quickly than any federally regulated steps can be proposed, debated, adopted and challenged. BNSF, the railroad owned by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway In. (NYSE: BRK-B), said last week that it will acquire up to 5,000 of the new rail tankers. Other rail operators and oil producers have said they will scrap the old DOT-111s.

It pays to remember that U.S. railroads are virtually self-regulating. Railroad consultant Fred Millar told the New York Times, “There is a telling lack of any new reporting and accountability measures, and federal resource augmentations, that could signal a new federal determination to reduce risks.” For the country’s railroads, this is an old story.

Another question worth pondering: Are the risks of another disaster such as the one that killed 47 people and destroyed a section of Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, higher or lower than the risks of a spill or explosion on the proposed Keystone XL pipeline?

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618