Why Slow Recovery Prospects Are Hammering Ford Stock

Photo of Chris Lange
By Chris Lange Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Why Slow Recovery Prospects Are Hammering Ford Stock

© fredrocko / Getty Images

Ford Motor Co. (NYSE: F | F Price Prediction) is at the heart of the American auto industry, and this coronavirus pandemic has induced a heart attack with a recovery that appears to be difficult. A recent earnings report has only shown some of the symptoms, and management is trying to help in its own way.

In March, Ford halted global production, and it plans a phased restart of production in Europe next week. Production in China was restarted in February, and about one-third of Ford vehicles sold during March were sold online, according Chief Operating Officer Jim Farley, who said that the “actions we took in China have become a best practice for us.” Online sales in the United States have not been as successful for dealers.

However, this seems to be the case for auto manufactures across the board, with one big exception. All the major U.S. auto manufacturers are in a race to recover from the pandemic. Like any race, it takes time, and shares of none of these companies have yet to reach their highs back in February.

On a year-to-date and 52-week, basis Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is the only company from this group that has seen a positive performance, with its stock up 83.6% and 200.9%, respectively. Ford, General Motors Co. (NYSE: GM) and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. (NYSE: FCAU) are each still down for the quarter: 45.9%, 38.1% and 37.7%, respectively.

[nativounit]

While Ford stock is at the back of the group in terms of its performance, the outlook provided from recent earnings doesn’t paint an encouraging picture going forward, for neither the stock nor the auto industry in general.

Earnings

Ford reported its most recent quarterly results in late April. While the first quarter’s results were bad, the company’s outlook for the second quarter was worse.

The automaker posted an adjusted diluted per-share loss of $0.23 on revenues of $34.3 billion in the first quarter, which compares to consensus estimates of a net loss of $0.06 per share and $34.5 billion in revenue. In the same period a year ago, the company reported earnings per share of $0.44 on revenues of $40.3 billion.

Ford’s adjusted earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) in the first quarter came to a loss of $600 million. In an outlook statement, Chief Financial Officer Tim Stone said the company expects an adjusted EBIT loss in the second quarter of more than $5 billion.

At the end of the quarter, Ford had $35.1 billion in liquidity lined up and $46.4 billion in cash and equivalents, including marketable securities. Stone noted that the company’s cash “is sufficient to take us through the end of the year.” On a GAAP basis, Ford’s first-quarter net loss totaled $2.0 billion. Adjusted free cash flow in the quarter was negative $2.2 billion.

[recirclink id=705159]

During the quarter, Ford fully drew down its existing credit lines and issued new junk-rated, unsecured debt of $8 billion. The company also suspended its dividend and share buybacks.

Ford issued no guidance for the second quarter or the full year. Wall Street seems to think that this could go from awful to even worse. Analysts are looking for a loss per share of $0.88 and revenues of $17.99 billion. Comparatively, Ford posted earnings of $0.28 per share and revenues of $35.76 billion in the second quarter of last year, essentially double estimated revenues for the most recent quarter.

Management to the Rescue

Ford COO Farley swooped in this quarter to double down on Ford stock. He paid about $1 million for 194,950 shares, at an average price of $5.13 apiece. Ford noted that the documents were filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday.

This purchase is notable, considering Farley’s base salary in 2019 was roughly $1.1 million. In 2019, Ford’s COO was paid $8.4 million in total compensation, an increase from 2018, when he earned $5.9 million.

Is this move by management too little and too late to make a difference?

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Chris Lange
About the Author Chris Lange →

Chris Lange is a writer for 24/7 Wall St., based in Houston. He has covered financial markets over the past decade with an emphasis on healthcare, tech, and IPOs. During this time, he has published thousands of articles with insightful analysis across these complex fields. Currently, Lange's focus is on military and geopolitical topics.

Lange's work has been quoted or mentioned in Forbes, The New York Times, Business Insider, USA Today, MSN, Yahoo, The Verge, Vice, The Intelligencer, Quartz, Nasdaq, The Motley Fool, Fox Business, International Business Times, The Street, Seeking Alpha, Barron’s, Benzinga, and many other major publications.

A graduate of Southwestern University in Georgetown, Texas, Lange majored in business with a particular focus on investments. He has previous experience in the banking industry and startups.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618