How ETFs That Followed Hedge Fund Strategies Performed in 2019

Photo of Paul Ausick
By Paul Ausick Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
How ETFs That Followed Hedge Fund Strategies Performed in 2019

© vm / Getty Images

The S&P 500 index returned 28.9% in 2019, nearly four times the return on a global hedge fund index. Yet some investors can’t seem to kick the hedge-fund habit. Go figure.

For example, according to a report Tuesday morning from Bloomberg, hedge fund manager D.E. Shaw returned 11.2% to investors in its Composite fund, the largest fund in the firm’s $50 billion total assets under management. The firm’s Oculus fund returned 11.8% in 2019, according to Bloomberg.

Investors in Shaw’s Composite fund can expect to pay 3% of their assets and 30% of the profit on those assets beginning this year. That’s higher than the famous hedge-fund “2 and 20” formula, where investors pay 2% of assets and 20% of profits in annual fees.

Shaw, contrary to hedge fund industry trends, is raising its fees. As of last May, many other hedge funds are dropping the “2 and 20” fee structure due to tepid performance. Average costs among all hedge funds, according to Credit Suisse, were just 1.45% of asset value and 16.9% of profits. Only 3% of funds still charged a 2% management fee while just 16% charged a 20% slice of profits.

At the time, we looked at five ETFs that followed different hedge fund strategies but cost far less in fees (and nothing in profits). None of the funds had more than $1 billion in assets under management (AUM) and only one had an expense ratio above 1%. The five ETFs were the IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (NYSEARCA: MNA), the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (NYSEARCA: QAI), the First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 ETF (NASDAQ: FVC), the WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (NYSEARCA: WTMF) and the AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (NYSEARCA: HDGE).

[nativounit]

In the five-year period between 2015 and 2019, the S&P 500 returned a hair more than 42%, including nearly 29% in 2019. Hedge Fund Research’s HFRX Global Hedge Fund Index posted an 8.62% return in 2019 and has a five-year return of 6.07%

In the following chart, we’ve shown each fund’s AUM and net asset value (NAV) in December, the expense ratio, the 2019 return on investment and the five-year return. The Dorsey Wright Dynamic Focus 5 fund has not yet reported its full-year return for 2019 and has been in existence only since March of 2016. Its one-year return comes from ETFdb.com, which calculates the result relative to a peer-group category. The AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear fund one-year performance data covers only the first nine months of 2019, and the five-year return data comes from ETFdb.

AUM NAV Expense Ratio 2019 Return 5-Year Return
MNA $931.2 million $33.14 0.77% 5.03% 3.73%
QAI $853.2 million $30.82 0.80% 9.36% 2.76%
FVC $430.9 million $27.63 0.89% 17.85% 9.07% (3 years)
WTMF $151 million $37.13 0.65% −3.19% −1.98%
HDGE $106.9 million $23.81 3.12% −21.97% −54.72%

[recirclink id=605690]

[wallst_email_signup]

Photo of Paul Ausick
About the Author Paul Ausick →

Paul Ausick has been writing for a673b.bigscoots-temp.com for more than a decade. He has written extensively on investing in the energy, defense, and technology sectors. In a previous life, he wrote technical documentation and managed a marketing communications group in Silicon Valley.

He has a bachelor's degree in English from the University of Chicago and now lives in Montana, where he fishes for trout in the summer and stays inside during the winter.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618