Nvidia vs TSM-Earnings Reveal AI Hardware Power Split

Photo of Vandita Jadeja
By Vandita Jadeja Published

Quick Read

  • Nvidia (NVDA) posted 73.21% revenue growth with Data Center segment at $62.31B and networking surging 263% year-over-year, while Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) grew 35.1% with 3nm wafers representing 25% of revenue and HPC platforms driving 61% of platform revenue. Nvidia carries $95.2B in supply commitments, primarily flowing to TSMC.

  • Nvidia dominates chip design and software stack economics as hyperscalers deploy Blackwell and prepare for Rubin instances, while TSMC captures foundry value through advanced node capacity at 74% of wafer revenue and 58.1% operating margins, making both essential partners in the AI value chain.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Nvidia vs TSM-Earnings Reveal AI Hardware Power Split

© 24/7 Wall St.

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction) and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (NYSE:TSM) just delivered the two most consequential earnings reports in AI hardware. NVIDIA closed fiscal 2026 with a 73.21% revenue surge, while TSMC, the foundry that physically builds those chips, posted 35.1% growth.

One designs the architecture. The other turns it into silicon. Their results show how AI dollars are splitting along the value chain.

Blackwell Networking Surges. 3nm Wafers Carry Taiwan.

NVIDIA’s Data Center segment hit $62.31 billion, but the wild card was networking, which jumped 263% year over year as NVLink fabric ramped for GB200 and GB300 systems. Jensen Huang framed the moment bluntly: “Computing demand is growing exponentially, the agentic AI inflection point has arrived.” Gaming also held up at $3.72 billion, helped by Blackwell consumer parts.

Business Driver NVIDIA TSMC
Main Growth Engine Data Center compute and NVLink 3nm and 5nm leading-edge wafers
Gross Margin 75.2% 66.2%
Forward Quarter Guide ~$78.0 billion $39.0 to $40.2 billion

TSMC’s mix tells the manufacturing side. Advanced nodes (7nm and below) made up 74% of wafer revenue, with 3nm alone at 25%. HPC, the platform housing AI accelerators, accounted for 61% of platform revenue. Wafer shipments climbed 28.1%, a useful read on real unit demand rather than pricing alone.

An infographic titled 'NVIDIA vs. TSM: The AI Hardware Engines' on a dark blue background. It visually compares NVIDIA and TSM across various financial and strategic metrics. The graphic is divided into sections detailing their roles in the AI value chain, specific company financials for NVIDIA (Q4 FY26 Data Center $62.31 Billion, Gross Margin 75.2%) and TSM (Q1 FY26 Advanced Nodes 74% wafer revenue, Gross Margin 66.2%), and a table of key financials and guidance. It concludes with a verdict comparing their exposure and risks, highlighting NVIDIA's platform economics and TSM's compounding.
24/7 Wall St.

Platform Owner vs. Capacity Owner

The strategic split runs deeper than the headline numbers. NVIDIA is selling a full stack: Rubin (which Huang says delivers an order-of-magnitude lower cost per token over Blackwell), CUDA, Nemotron 3, BlueField-4, and Isaac GR00T for robotics. The multiyear Meta partnership spanning millions of Blackwell and Rubin GPUs shows where pricing power lives.

TSMC’s bet is physical: capex of NT$350.76 billion last quarter, Arizona ramping (the first Blackwell wafer rolled off U.S. soil there), and a 2nm pipeline. Notably, NVIDIA carries $95.2 billion in supply commitments, much of which flows to TSMC. They are partners.

Risks diverge too. NVIDIA’s Q1 FY27 outlook explicitly excludes any Data Center compute revenue from China, a real revenue hole that guidance still beats through. TSMC carries Taiwan geopolitical risk and FX swings (USD/NTD moved 32.88 to 31.59).

The Next Test Is Rubin Pull-Through

I want to see whether Rubin instances at AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and Oracle generate the same hyperscaler enthusiasm Blackwell did. Watch TSMC’s Q2 guide too: $39 to $40 billion with operating margin of 56.5% to 58.5% implies leading-edge utilization stays near full. 

Why I Lean Toward TSMC for the Boring Compounding

If you want concentrated AI exposure with the deepest software moat, NVIDIA still owns the room. Free cash flow of $34.9 billion in a single quarter is staggering, and the forward P/E of 26.6 looks reasonable against 95.6% earnings growth.

Personally, I lean TSMC. Every credible AI roadmap, including NVIDIA’s Rubin, runs through Hsinchu. Trading near a forward P/E of 27 with 58.1% operating margins, TSMC captures the AI buildout without single-customer concentration.

For turnaround-style mandates, neither name screens cleanly. That said, for defensive AI exposure, TSMC stands out. For platform economics, NVIDIA stands out. I would only change my view if leading-edge utilization in Taiwan slipped, or if Google’s TPU pulled meaningful share from CUDA workloads.

Photo of Vandita Jadeja
About the Author Vandita Jadeja →

Vandita Jadeja is a financial copywriter who loves to read and write about stocks. She believes in buying and holding for long term gains. Her knowledge of words and numbers helps her write clear stock analysis. She has contributed to several publications, including the Joy Wallet, Benzinga, The Motley Fool and InvestorPlace.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618