Cybercrime’s $100 Billion Cost

Photo of Douglas A. McIntyre
By Douglas A. McIntyre Published
This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.

Cybercrime’s cost to the U.S. economy is immense, at least by the standards of other expenses to gross domestic product (GDP). But the amount may be small enough that the final effects are very modest. If so, the rush to protect the cyber goods and services people and companies own may cost more than the damage. Cyber protection, in other words, may be money wasted.

The Center for Strategic and International Study reports in its new research paper, The Economic Impact of Cybercrime and Cyber Espionage:

If we are right in assuming that “tolerated costs”from malicious cyber activity falls into the same range as car crashes, pilferage, and drugs, this is a “ceiling” for an estimate of loss. They suggest that at most, cybercrime, cyber espionage costs less than 1% of GDP. For the US, for example, our best guess is that losses may reach $100 billion annually. To put this in perspective, annual expenditures on research and development in the US are $400 billion a year and $100 million in stolen IP does not translate into $100 million in gain for the acquirer.

It may be a poor idea to compare cybercrime to research and development, which many analysts believe is essential to America’s future. To claim that anything is negative at the level of research investment is to say that it is actually enormously large.

Despite the effort of the Center for Strategic and International Study to claim that cybercrime takes a fairly modest portion of America’s productivity and erodes it away, the analysis actually makes the problem substantial:

The effect of malicious cyber activities on jobs needs further work. The Commerce Department estimated in 2011 that $1 billion in exports equaled 5,080 jobs. This means that the high end estimate of $100 billion in losses from cyber espionage would translate into 508,000 lost jobs. While this translates into a third of a percent decrease in employment, this is not the “net” loss as many workers will find other jobs. The real concern might be if the lost jobs are in manufacturing or other high paying sectors. If workers displaced by cyber espionage do not find jobs that pay as well or better, the victim country would be worse off. The effect of cyber espionage may be to move workers from high paying blue-collar jobs into lower paying work or unemployment.

Whatever mitigating factors the authors may claim, anywhere near 500,000 jobs lost undermines, or would undermine in the future, some massive portion of the health of the economy.

Finally, beyond jobs, the study makes the point the there are factors beyond economic loss that should be taken into account:

We have not included one potential category of loss — the cost of the “pain and suffering” experienced by the victim. These costs are usually assigned by a court and while some are fixed (such as the cost of a human life in a crash) others can vary widely.

And at this point, the analysis takes a turn toward the absurd. A car crash and identity theft cannot be compared so blithely, at least not for the person in the hospital bed or the one who cannot use a credit card.

Photo of Douglas A. McIntyre
About the Author Douglas A. McIntyre →

Douglas A. McIntyre is the co-founder, chief executive officer and editor in chief of 24/7 Wall St. and 24/7 Tempo. He has held these jobs since 2006.

McIntyre has written thousands of articles for 24/7 Wall St. He is an expert on corporate finance, the automotive industry, media companies and international finance. He has edited articles on national demographics, sports, personal income and travel.

His work has been quoted or mentioned in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, NBC News, Time, The New Yorker, HuffPost USA Today, Business Insider, Yahoo, AOL, MarketWatch, The Atlantic, Bloomberg, New York Post, Chicago Tribune, Forbes, The Guardian and many other major publications. McIntyre has been a guest on CNBC, the BBC and television and radio stations across the country.

A magna cum laude graduate of Harvard College, McIntyre also was president of The Harvard Advocate. Founded in 1866, the Advocate is the oldest college publication in the United States.

TheStreet.com, Comps.com and Edgar Online are some of the public companies for which McIntyre served on the board of directors. He was a Vicinity Corporation board member when the company was sold to Microsoft in 2002. He served on the audit committees of some of these companies.

McIntyre has been the CEO of FutureSource, a provider of trading terminals and news to commodities and futures traders. He was president of Switchboard, the online phone directory company. He served as chairman and CEO of On2 Technologies, the video compression company that provided video compression software for Adobe’s Flash. Google bought On2 in 2009.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618