George Kamel did not mince words when a 24-year-old newlywed called into The Ramsey Show asking whether he should skip a vacation to save more for a house. “You guys are going to be multi-multi-multi-millionaires if you keep living this way, but you’re going to have a miserable marriage if you keep living the way you’re wanting to live.”
The caller, identified as D on the show, is 24 years old, recently married, with no debt, $23,000 in savings, $45,000 in a brokerage account, and $54,000 in retirement accounts. The couple has a combined household income of $115,000. The vacation his wife wants would cost approximately $3,000.
D’s concern was that spending anything felt like falling behind on a house down payment in an expensive market. Kamel’s advice: “Go on the freaking vacation, man. What do you mean you got to catch up? You’re ahead of like 99.9% of America.”
He is right. The national savings rate stood at 4% in Q4 2025, and it has been declining steadily from 15% in 2020. A 24-year-old with $122,000 in total investable assets is not behind. He is way ahead of most of his peers.
The Actual Math on That $3,000 Vacation
Kamel framed the opportunity cost. “If I told you, ‘Hey, John, when you retire, you could either have $9.85 million or $9.9 million,'” he said. “Would you say, ‘Yeah, I’m willing to take the $9.85 million. That’s fine?'”
His point is that the $3,000 vacation is a rounding error against a multi-decade trajectory. On a $115,000 combined income, half a month of savings is recoverable in weeks, not years.
Kamel argued that extreme frugality should be a tool, not a permanent identity. When debt is gone and savings are healthy, continuing to restrict spending as if you were still in crisis mode can have a real cost — on your quality of life.
Co-host Rachel Cruze referenced research from Arthur Brooks on the show. “He said … the one that does not bring you happiness is just buying stuff,” she said. “But one of the things that can buy you happiness is buying experiences with people you love.”
Not Everyone Should Rush to Vacations
Kamel’s advice fits a specific profile: someone with no debt, meaningful savings and strong income. The advice does not apply to someone carrying high-interest debt, living paycheck to paycheck, or with no emergency fund. For that person, the $3,000 vacation is genuinely reckless.
Kamel’s core point is that over-saving can damage a marriage as reliably as over-spending. A $3,000 trip is totally reasonable for a couple with $122,000 in assets and zero debt. It’s time to live a little!
Top Gaining Stocks
Top Losing Stocks