Warning: “Existential Risk” as Mega IPOs Could Trigger $100 Billion Stock Selloff

Photo of Jeremy Phillips
By Jeremy Phillips Published

Quick Read

  • Steve Sosnik (The Compound and Friends) frames the pending OpenAI and SpaceX IPO wave as “an existential risk” to passive fund mechanics, arguing that forced index inclusion will trigger forced selling of mega-cap tech stocks like Nvidia (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT).

  • When SpaceX joins the S&P 500 just 15 days after its IPO in a mechanical, non-discretionary rebalancing event, passive funds must immediately buy a freshly-listed stock before it’s seasoned, requiring forced sales of existing holdings; Microsoft (MSFT) has already fallen 20.34% year-to-date as the buyback tailwind that suppressed supply for years collides with the arrival of an IPO supply wave.

  • The structural risk isn’t fundamentals but plumbing: simultaneous passive fund purchases of newly-listed mega-IPOs will exhaust the pool of natural buyers by day 15, potentially forcing liquidation of the mega-cap tech stocks that anchored index fund returns.

This post may contain links from our sponsors and affiliates, and Flywheel Publishing may receive compensation for actions taken through them.
Warning: “Existential Risk” as Mega IPOs Could Trigger $100 Billion Stock Selloff

© Arsenii Palivoda / Shutterstock.com

If passive fund mechanics are your jam, and mega-cap concentration risk is the bread you eat it on, what Steve Sosnik laid out recently on The Compound and Friends is one of the more unsettling structural meals you’ll ever eat. The episode “Stocks Took the Stairs Down and the Elevator Up,” frames something most retail investors aren’t thinking about.

Sosnik called the pending IPO wave “one of, to me, an existential risk.” That’s a strong phrase deserving serious attention.

The Forced Selling Mechanism

When a company goes public and joins a major index, passive funds must buy it. Something else gets sold to balance. With two historically large IPOs arriving in the same window, the math gets uncomfortable fast.

OpenAI raised $120 billion in the private market at an $830 billion valuation. Prediction markets currently price a 74.5% probability of OpenAI’s IPO market cap exceeding $800 billion. SpaceX is targeting what could be the largest IPO ever, requiring $25 billion from retail investors alone, with prediction markets pricing a 93.5% probability of a SpaceX IPO by December 31, 2026.

The critical wrinkle Sosnik flagged: SpaceX must be added to indexes just 15 days after listing, before the stock is even seasoned. That’s a mechanical, non-discretionary rebalancing event. Passive funds don’t get to wait.

Who Gets Sold

NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA | NVDA Price Prediction), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), and Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) are the obvious candidates. In the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY), these three represent 7.57%, 6.56%, and 4.92% of the fund respectively. In the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQ), concentration is heavier: 8.69% for NVDA, 7.47% for AAPL, and 5.55% for MSFT.

Microsoft is already showing strain. Despite reporting strong business results, the stock has fallen 20% year-to-date and sits at $384.37. Sosnik’s framing is sharp: “The premise here was Microsoft and friends were just they didn’t know what to do with their cash. Now they have to go to the well to borrow money.” The buyback tailwind that suppressed supply for years is fading as a supply wave arrives.

The Post-IPO Liquidity Trap

Sosnik raised a second problem. “Everyone’s going to buy it on day one and it’s like, all right, so who do you have left to trade this thing?” A stock bought by every passive fund simultaneously on day 15 exhausts a massive pool of natural buyers. The Blackstone 2007 IPO looms as a historical reference for what peak-cycle mega-listings signal about market timing.

The VIX recently spiked to 31.05 on March 27 before settling back to 19.23 as of April 10. The market absorbed one stress event. Whether it can absorb $2 trillion in new supply is the question Sosnik is asking that nobody else seems to be.

If you hold SPY or QQQ in a long-term portfolio, you’re already long this risk. The structural argument isn’t about whether OpenAI or SpaceX are good businesses. It’s about whether the plumbing of passive investing can handle what’s coming without flushing out the stocks that got you here.

Photo of Jeremy Phillips
About the Author Jeremy Phillips →

I've been writing about stocks and personal finance for 20+ years. I believe all great companies are tech companies in the long run, and I invest accordingly.

Featured Reads

Our top personal finance-related articles today. Your wallet will thank you later.

Continue Reading

Top Gaining Stocks

CBOE Vol: 1,568,143
PSKY Vol: 12,285,993
STX Vol: 7,378,346
ORCL Vol: 26,317,675
DDOG Vol: 6,247,779

Top Losing Stocks

LKQ
LKQ Vol: 4,367,433
CLX Vol: 13,260,523
SYK Vol: 4,519,455
MHK Vol: 1,859,865
AMGN Vol: 3,818,618